Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37729280›Full record

ArticleArquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery2023

ACUTE CHOLECYSTITIS IN HIGH-RISK PATIENTS. SURGICAL, RADIOLOGICAL, OR ENDOSCOPIC TREATMENT? BRAZILIAN COLLEGE OF DIGESTIVE SURGERY POSITION PAPER.

Júlio Cezar Uili Coelho, Marco Aurélio Raeder da Costa, Marcelo Enne, Orlando Jorge Martins Torres, Wellington Andraus, Antonio Carlos Ligocki Campos

Open access · diamondAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. ANATOMIC VARIATIONS OF THE CYSTIC ARTERY DURING CHOLECYSTECTOMIES: IS IT IMPORTANT FOR THE SURGEON TO KNOW?Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Cholecystocutaneous Fistula.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  8. Ultrasound-Guided Interventions in the Biliary System.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  9. EXPECTANT MANAGEMENT OR CHOLECYSTECTOMY IN ASYMPTOMATIC CHOLELITHIASIS.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2024
    Article
  10. BILE DUCT INJURY REPAIR IN A PATIENT WITH SITUS INVERSUS TOTALIS.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2024
    Article
  11. CHOLECYSTECTOMY WITH INTRAOPERATIVE ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY: DOES THE ORDER MATTER?Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2024
    Article
  12. ACUTE ABDOMEN IN INTENSIVE CARE UNIT: ETIOLOGY, COMORBIDITY AND SEVERITY OF 1,523 PATIENTS.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Júlio Cezar Uili CoelhoUniversidade Federal do Paraná, Department of Surgery - Curitiba (PR), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7622-8592
Marco Aurélio Raeder da CostaUniversidade Federal do Paraná, Department of Surgery - Curitiba (PR), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3452-2398
Marcelo EnneHospital Federal Ipanema - Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8714-3295
Orlando Jorge Martins TorresUniversidade Federal do Maranhão, Department of Surgery - São Luís (MA), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7398-5395
Wellington AndrausUniversidade de São Paulo, Department of Gastroenterology, São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5162-138X
Antonio Carlos Ligocki CamposUniversidade Federal do Paraná, Department of Surgery - Curitiba (PR), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5080-8380
Universidade Federal do Paraná · BRHospital Samaritano de São Paulo · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Federal do Maranhão · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute cholecystitis (AC) is an acute inflammatory process of the gallbladder that may be associated with potentially severe complications, such as empyema, gangrene, perforation of the gallbladder, and sepsis. The gold standard treatment for AC is laparoscopic cholecystectomy. However, for a small group of AC patients, the risk of laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be very high, mainly in the elderly with associated severe diseases. In these critically ill patients, percutaneous cholecystostomy or endoscopic ultrasound gallbladder drainage may be a temporary therapeutic option, a bridge to cholecystectomy. The objective of this Brazilian College of Digestive Surgery Position Paper is to present new advances in AC treatment in high-risk surgical patients to help surgeons, endoscopists, and physicians select the best treatment for their patients. The effectiveness, safety, advantages, disadvantages, and outcomes of each procedure are discussed. The main conclusions are: a) AC patients with elevated surgical risk must be preferably treated in tertiary hospitals where surgical, radiological, and endoscopic expertise and resources are available; b) The optimal treatment modality for high-surgical-risk patients should be individualized based on clinical conditions and available expertise; c) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy remains an excellent option of treatment, mainly in hospitals in which percutaneous or endoscopic gallbladder drainage is not available; d) Percutaneous cholecystostomy and endoscopic gallbladder drainage should be performed only in well-equipped hospitals with experienced interventional radiologist and/or endoscopist; e) Cholecystostomy catheter should be removed after resolution of AC. However, in patients who have no clinical condition to undergo cholecystectomy, the catheter may be maintained for a prolonged period or even definitively; f) If the cholecystostomy catheter is maintained for a long period of time several complications may occur, such as bleeding, bile leakage, obstruction, pain at the insertion site, accidental removal of the catheter, and recurrent AC; g) The ideal waiting time between cholecystostomy and cholecystectomy has not yet been established and ranges from immediately after clinical improvement to months. h) Long waiting periods between cholecystostomy and cholecystectomy may be associated with new episodes of acute cholecystitis, multiple hospital readmissions, and increased costs. Finally, when selecting the best treatment option other aspects should also be considered, such as costs, procedures available at the medical center, and the patient's desire. The patient and his family should be fully informed about all treatment options, so they can help making the final decision.

Indexed as

Cholecystectomy, LaparoscopicCholecystitis, AcuteDigestive System Surgical ProceduresAgedBrazilDrainageHumans

Identifiers

PMID37729280
PMCPMC10510100
OpenAlexW4386831889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.