Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37729226›Full record

SynthesisRevista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992)2023

The effect of Pilates on pain during pregnancy and labor: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Tulay Yilmaz, Özlem Taş, Sevil Günaydin, Hüsniye Dinç Kaya

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07316348 (The Effect of Vocalization and Spontaneous Pushing Techniques Used in the Second Stage of Labour on Birth Outcomes), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07316348 naenrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Vocalization and Spontaneous Pushing Techniques Used in the Second Stage of Labour on Birth Outcomes: A Randomised Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorIstanbul University - CerrahpasaRan2025 to 2026Enrolled112ConditionsMaternal Pushing Techniques, Perineal Trauma, Maternal Fatigue, LaborArmsThe vocalization straining technique will be used.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tulay YilmazIstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Midwifery - Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3706-3844
Özlem TaşTR Ministry of Health Istanbul Güngören A. Nafiz Gürman Family Health Center - Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8572-319X
Sevil GünaydinIstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Midwifery - Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2539-8783
Hüsniye Dinç KayaIstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Midwifery - Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8461-643X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis systematic review and meta-analysis study was conducted to reveal the effect of Pilates on pain during pregnancy and labor.

methodsThe PubMed, ScienceDirect, MEDLINE, Ovid, EBSCO, CINAHL Plus, Cochrane Library databases, and Google Scholar databases were used to access the articles published in international journals, and the Dergipark, Turkish Clinics, and ULAKBİM databases were scanned to access the articles published in national journals between October 30 and November 30, 2022. The data were analyzed using Review Manager 5.4.

resultsThis study included four articles. According to the meta-analysis results, it was elucidated that Pilates exercise during pregnancy was not statistically effective in reducing pain during pregnancy (Z=0.61, p=0.54), but it was effective in reducing pain intensity during labor (Z=11.20, p<0.00001).

conclusionThis study concluded that Pilates exercise was not effective in reducing pain during pregnancy but was effective in reducing labor pain. There is a need for more research on the subject. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NO: CRD42023387512.

Indexed as

Labor, ObstetricPainDatabases, FactualExerciseExercise TherapyFemaleHumansPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID37729226
PMCPMC10511286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.