ArticleRevista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992)2023
The new prognostic factor in pre-intubation follow-up of critically ill patients: integrated pulmonary index monitoring.
Article in Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe objective of this study was to identify the integrated pulmonary index in the follow-up of non-intubated critically ill patients in the emergency department and its efficacy in deciding on advanced airway application in comparison with the Glasgow Coma Scale.
methodsThis is a prospective, single-center, methodological study. In our study, we recorded the demographic characteristics, Glasgow Coma Scale, and the integrated pulmonary index of 90 patients with respiratory failure who were followed up in the emergency department between June 1, 2019 and September 1, 2019, and we compared the results of Glasgow Coma Scale and integrated pulmonary index in making the endotracheal intubation decision.
resultsEndotracheal intubation was applied to 30% of the 90 patients included in the study. The area under the curve was calculated as 0.906 for integrated pulmonary index and 0.860 for Glasgow Coma Scale in predicting endotracheal intubation. There was no significant difference between the area under the curves of integrated pulmonary index and Glasgow Coma Scale. According to the best cutoff values determined in the estimation of endotracheal intubation, sensitivity was 74.07% and specificity was 95.24% for integrated pulmonary index, and sensitivity was 74.07% and specificity was 85.71% for Glasgow Coma Scale.
conclusionThe integrated pulmonary index monitoring provides an objective evaluation in the follow-up of critically ill patients with spontaneous breathing in the emergency department and is predictive in deciding on timely endotracheal intubation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.