Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37729195›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2023

Engineered bone marrow as a clinically relevant ex vivo model for primary bone cancer research and drug screening.

Katherine H Griffin, Steven W Thorpe, Aimy Sebastian, Nicholas R Hum, Thomas P Coonan, Isabel S Sagheb, Gabriela G Loots, R Lor Randall, J Kent Leach

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Biological Sample Collection to Advance Research and Treatment: A Fight Osteosarcoma Through European Research and Euro Ewing Consortium Statement.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024
    Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Gelatin maleimide microgels for hematopoietic progenitor cell encapsulation.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Katherine H GriffinDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Davis Health, Sacramento, CA 95817.ORCID 0000-0003-1207-4624
Steven W ThorpeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Davis Health, Sacramento, CA 95817.
Aimy SebastianPhysical and Life Sciences, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550.
Nicholas R HumPhysical and Life Sciences, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550.
Thomas P CoonanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Davis, CA 95616.
Isabel S SaghebDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Davis, CA 95616.
Gabriela G LootsDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Davis Health, Sacramento, CA 95817.
R Lor RandallDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Davis Health, Sacramento, CA 95817.
J Kent LeachDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Davis Health, Sacramento, CA 95817.ORCID 0000-0002-1673-3335
University of California, Davis · USLawrence Livermore National Laboratory · US

Funding

Staff InvestigatorsP30CA093373 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI KC KENT LLOYD · 2002 to 2026
$84.9M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA093373
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteosarcoma (OS) is the most common primary malignant bone cancer in children and adolescents. While numerous other cancers now have promising therapeutic advances, treatment options for OS have remained unchanged since the advent of standard chemotherapeutics and offer less than a 25% 5-y survival rate for those with metastatic disease. This dearth of clinical progress underscores a lack of understanding of OS progression and necessitates the study of this disease in an innovative system. Here, we adapt a previously described engineered bone marrow (eBM) construct for use as a three-dimensional platform to study how microenvironmental and immune factors affect OS tumor progression. We form eBM by implanting acellular bone-forming materials in mice and explanting the cellularized constructs after 8 wk for study. We interrogate the influence of the anatomical implantation site on eBM tissue quality, test ex vivo stability under normoxic (5% O

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsOsteosarcomaAdolescentAnimalsBone MarrowChildDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalEarly Detection of CancerHumansMicebone marrowcancermodelosteosarcomatumorigenesis

Identifiers

PMID37729195
PMCPMC10523456
OpenAlexW4386884131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.