Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37729177›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2023

Durability of the deltamethrin-treated polypropylene long-lasting net LifeNet® in a pyrethroid resistance area in south western Benin: A phase III trial.

Armel Djènontin, Daleb Alfa, Aziz Bouraima, Christophe Soares, Amal Dahounto, Sylvie Cornélie, Marc Egrot, Georgia Damien, Franck Remoué, André Barembaye Sagna and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase III
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Armel DjènontinCentre de Recherche Entomologique de Cotonou (CREC), Cotonou, Bénin.
Daleb AlfaCentre de Recherche Entomologique de Cotonou (CREC), Cotonou, Bénin.
Aziz BouraimaCentre de Recherche Entomologique de Cotonou (CREC), Cotonou, Bénin.ORCID 0009-0003-4355-2796
Christophe SoaresCentre de Recherche Entomologique de Cotonou (CREC), Cotonou, Bénin.
Amal DahountoCentre de Recherche Entomologique de Cotonou (CREC), Cotonou, Bénin.
Sylvie CornélieCentre de Recherche Entomologique de Cotonou (CREC), Cotonou, Bénin.
Marc EgrotCentre de Recherche Entomologique de Cotonou (CREC), Cotonou, Bénin.ORCID 0000-0002-3871-280X
Georgia DamienCentre de Recherche Pour la Lutte Contre les Maladies Infectieuses Tropicales (CReMIT), Université D'Abomey-Calavi (UAC), Cotonou, Bénin.
Franck RemouéCentre de Recherche Entomologique de Cotonou (CREC), Cotonou, Bénin.
André Barembaye SagnaMIVEGEC, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8586-792X
Nicolas MoirouxMIVEGEC, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, Montpellier, France.
Cédric PennetierCentre de Recherche Entomologique de Cotonou (CREC), Cotonou, Bénin.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversité d'Abomey-Calavi · BJ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLong-lasting insecticidal bed nets (LLINs) are a key measure for preventing malaria and their evaluation is coordinated by the World Health Organization Pesticide Evaluation Scheme (WHOPES). LifeNet® was granted WHOPES time-limited interim recommendation in 2011 after successful Phase I and Phase II evaluations. Here, we evaluated the durability and community acceptance of LifeNet® in a Phase III trial from June 2014 to June 2017 in Benin rural area.

methodsA prospective longitudinal, cluster-randomized, controlled trial with households as the unit of observation was designed to assess the performance of LifeNet® over a three-year period, using a WHOPES fully recommended LLIN (PermaNet® 2.0) as a positive control. The primary outcomes were the bioassay performance using WHO cone assays and tunnel tests, the insecticide content and physical integrity.

resultsAt baseline, 100% of LLINs were within the tolerance limits of their target deltamethrin concentrations. By 36 months only 17.3% of LifeNet® and 8.5% of PermaNet® LLINs still were within their target deltamethrin concentrations. Despite these low rates, 100% of both LLINs meet WHO efficacy criteria (≥ 80% mortality or ≥ 95% knockdown or tunnel test criteria of ≥ 80% mortality or ≥ 90% blood-feeding inhibition) after 36 months using WHO cone bio-assays and tunnel tests. The proportion of LLINs in good physical condition was 33% for LifeNet® and 29% for PermaNet® after 36 months. After 36 M the survivorship was 21% and 26% for LifeNet® and PermaNet® respectively. Although both LLINs were well accepted by the population, complaints of side effects were significantly higher among LifeNet® users than PermaNet® ones.

conclusionLifeNet® LLINs did meet WHO criteria for bio-efficacy throughout the study period and were well accepted by the population. This is an important step towards getting a full WHO recommendation for use in malaria endemic countries.

Indexed as

InsecticidesPesticidesPyrethrinsBeninHumansNitrilesPolypropylenesProspective StudiesdecamethrinInsecticidesNitrilesPesticidesPolypropylenesPyrethrins

Identifiers

PMID37729177
PMCPMC10511067
OpenAlexW4386884097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.