ArticlePloS one2023
Last-percent improvement in eligibility rates of crop seeds based on quality evaluation using near-infrared imaging spectrometry.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- WSPSorter: a real-time integrated system for non-destructive purity sorting of watermelon seeds based on rotary singulation and near infrared spectroscopy.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As the world population continues to grow, the need for high-quality crop seeds that promise stable food production is increasing. Conversely, excessive demand for high quality is causing "seed loss and waste" due to slight shortfalls in eligibility rates. In this study, we applied near-infrared imaging spectrometry combined with machine learning techniques to evaluate germinability and paternal haplotype in crop seeds from 6 species and 8 cultivars. Candidate discriminants for quality evaluation were derived by linear sparse modeling using the seed reflectance spectra as explanatory variables. To systematically proceed with model selection, we defined the sorting condition where the recovery rate of seeds matches the initial eligibility rate (iP) as "standard condition". How much the eligibility rate after sorting (P) increases from iP under this condition offers a reasonable criterion for ranking candidate models. Moreover, the model performance under conditions with adjusted discrimination strength was verified using a metric "relative precision" (rP) defined as (P-iP)/(1-iP). Because rP, compared to precision (= P), is less dependent on iP in relation to recall (R), i.e., recovery rate of eligible seeds, the rP-R curve and area under the curve also offer useful criteria for spotting better discriminant models. We confirmed that the batches of seeds given higher discriminant scores by the models selected with reference to these criteria were more enriched with eligible seeds. The method presented can be readily implemented in developing a sorting device that enables "last-percent improvement" in eligibility rates of crop seeds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.