Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37728738›Full record

ReviewInnere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany)2023

[With a tumor diagnosis in the intensive care unit].

Gernot Beutel, Tobias Liebregts, Boris Böll

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gernot BeutelKlinik für Hämatologie, Hämostaseologie, Onkologie und Stammzelltransplantation, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Deutschland. beutel.gernot@mh-hannover.de.
Tobias LiebregtsKlinik für Hämatologie und Stammzelltransplantation, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Deutschland.
Boris BöllKlinik I für Innere Medizin, Centrum für Integrierte Onkologie (CIO), Internistische Intensivmedizin/Hämatologie-Onkologie, Uniklinik Köln, Köln, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumor patients nowadays show significantly improved survival rates due to advancements in modern intensive care medicine, particularly in the case of organ failure. The previous reluctance towards implementing intensive medical care measures in patients with a tumorous disease is no longer justified. For successful intensive care treatment, the timing and the mode of admission along with the specific intensive care measures and underlying organ dysfunction(s) are crucial factors for the prognosis. To ensure appropriate treatment in clinical practice and to balance between overly restrictive admission criteria and overtreatment, a triage system could be beneficial. This would consider the prognosis of the underlying malignant disease, the performance status of the patient, available treatment options and a dynamic assessment of the course of the intensive medical care. Long-term results of tumor patients show that around 80% of tumor patients who have been in the intensive care unit present physical and mental health similar to those who were never admitted. Even the majority of patients who needed ongoing cancer treatment due to tumor stage did not show any differences in treatment intensity and their remission status after 6 months. A successful intensive care medicine, the individualized definition of aims, as well as adjustment of the treatment goals, require close collaboration between hematologists, oncologists, and intensive care physicians.

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitsNeoplasmsCritical CareEmotionsHospitalizationHumansSyndromeChimeric antigen receptor T cellsCriteria for intensive care transferEarly interventionIntensive care prognosisOrgan failure in cancer patientsStem cell transplantationTriage system

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.