Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37728568›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2023

Touch localization after nerve repair in the hand: insights from a new measurement tool.

Martin Weber, Andrew Marshall, Ronan Timircan, Francis McGlone, Simon J Watt, Obi Onyekwelu, Louise Booth, Edwin Jesudason, Vivien Lees, Kenneth F Valyear

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Martin WeberSchool of Psychology and Sport Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0000-1370-8559
Andrew MarshallDepartment of Musculoskeletal Biology, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8273-7089
Ronan TimircanSchool of Psychology and Sport Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, United Kingdom.
Francis McGloneInstitute of Psychology, Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0881-635X
Simon J WattSchool of Psychology and Sport Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7883-4767
Obi OnyekweluDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Cosham, United Kingdom.
Louise BoothDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Bangor, United Kingdom.
Edwin JesudasonDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Bangor, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7855-2030
Vivien LeesDepartment of Plastic Surgery, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9928-6157
Kenneth F ValyearSchool of Psychology and Sport Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9513-8445
Bangor University · GBBetsi Cadwaladr University Health Board · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GBPortsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Errors of touch localization after hand nerve injuries are common, and their measurement is important for evaluating functional recovery. Available empirical accounts have significant methodological limitations, however, and a quantitatively rigorous and detailed description of touch localization in nerve injury is lacking. Here, we develop a new method of measuring touch localization and evaluate its value for use in nerve injury. Eighteen patients with transection injuries to the median/ulnar nerves and 33 healthy controls were examined. The hand was blocked from the participant's view and points were marked on the volar surface using an ultraviolet (UV) pen. These points served as targets for touch stimulation. Two photographs were taken, one with and one without UV lighting, rendering targets seen and unseen, respectively. The experimenter used the photograph with visible targets to register their locations, and participants reported the felt position of each stimulation on the photograph with unseen targets. The error of localization and its directional components were measured, separate from misreferrals-errors made across digits, or from a digit to the palm. Nerve injury was found to significantly increase the error of localization. These effects were specific to the territory of the repaired nerve and showed considerable variability at the individual level, with some patients showing no evidence of impairment. A few patients also made abnormally high numbers of misreferrals, and the pattern of misreferrals in patients differed from that observed in healthy controls.

Indexed as

TouchTouch PerceptionHandHumansMedian NerveUlnar Nervelocognosianerve injurynerve repairreinnervation errorstouch localization

Identifiers

PMID37728568
PMCPMC10994642
OpenAlexW4386878218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.