Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37728161›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of methods in psychiatric research2023

Ecological monitoring of emotional intensity, variability, and instability in individuals with schizophrenia spectrum disorders: Results of a multicentre study.

Cristina Zarbo, Manuel Zamparini, Alessandra Patrono, Cosima Calini, Philip D Harvey, Letizia Casiraghi, Massimo Clerici, Matteo Malvezzi, Matteo Rocchetti, Fabrizio Starace and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of methods in psychiatric research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Cristina ZarboDepartment of Psychology, University of Milano Bicocca, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6613-4445
Manuel ZampariniUnit of Epidemiological and Evaluation Psychiatry, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy.
Alessandra PatronoUnit of Epidemiological and Evaluation Psychiatry, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy.
Cosima CaliniDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
Philip D HarveyDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA.
Letizia CasiraghiDepartment of Brain and Behavioural Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Massimo ClericiDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
Matteo MalvezziDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Matteo RocchettiDepartment of Brain and Behavioural Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Fabrizio StaraceDepartment of Mental Health and Dependence, AUSL of Modena, Modena, Italy.
Giovanni de GirolamoUnit of Epidemiological and Evaluation Psychiatry, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1611-8324
DiAPAson Collaborators

Funding

Ministero della Salute 2018-12365514
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvaluating emotional experiences in the life of people with Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorder (SSD) is fundamental for developing interventions aimed at promoting well-being in specific times and contexts. However, little is known about emotional variability in this population. In DiAPAson project, we evaluated between- and within-person differences in emotional intensity, variability, and instability between people with SSD and healthy controls, and the association with psychiatric severity and levels of functioning.

methods102 individuals diagnosed with SSD (57 residential patients, 46 outpatients) and 112 healthy controls were thoroughly evaluated. Daily emotions were prospectively assessed with Experience Sampling Method eight times a day for a week. Statistical analyses included ANOVA, correlations, and generalized linear models.

resultsParticipants with SSD, and especially residential patients, had a higher intensity of negative emotions when compared to controls. Moreover, all people with SSD reported a greater between-person-variability of both positive and negative emotions and greater intra-variability of negative emotions than healthy controls. In addition, the emotion variability in people with SSD does not follow a linear or quadratic trend but is more "chaotic" if compared to controls.

conclusionsAdequate assessments of positive and negative emotional experiences and their time course in people with SSD can assist mental health professionals with well-being assessment, implementing targeted interventions through the identification of patterns, triggers, and potential predictors of emotional states.

Indexed as

emotional instabilityemotional variabilityexperience sampling methodprospective designpsychosis

Identifiers

PMID37728161
PMCPMC10804261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.