ArticleFederal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS2023
Outcomes in Patients With Curative Malignancies Receiving Filgrastim as Primary Prophylaxis.
Article in Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis has been shown to reduce the risk and duration of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and febrile neutropenia and is recommended for at-risk patients receiving chemotherapy. Within the South Texas Veterans Health Care System, daily filgrastim injections remain the preferred formulation of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia. Methods: This retrospective, single-center cohort study included 59 patients who received daily filgrastim as primary prophylaxis with a curative cancer diagnosis and a chemotherapy regimen at the South Texas Veterans Health Care System from September 1, 2015 to September 24, 2020. Patients had either a high risk for febrile neutropenia or a chemotherapy regimen with an intermediate risk for febrile neutropenia and additional risk factors. The primary outcome was the incidence of neutropenia/febrile neutropenia leading to treatment delays. Secondary outcomes included chemotherapy dose decreases or discontinuations, hospitalizations, days of hospitalization, infections, extended duration of filgrastim, and transitions to pegfilgrastim due to neutropenia/febrile neutropenia. Results: Patients received a median (IQR) of 7 (5-10) doses of filgrastim for primary prophylaxis. Overall, 10 patients (17%) experienced treatment delays due to neutropenia/febrile neutropenia. Fifteen patients (25%) were hospitalized with a median (IQR) length of stay of 5 (4-7) days, 9 patients (15%) had documented infections, and 2 patients (3%) required a chemotherapy dose reduction. Additionally, 9 patients (15%) required an additional median (IQR) of 2 (2-5) doses of filgrastim, and 9 (15%) patients were transitioned to pegfilgrastim. Conclusions: These results suggest that additional measures such as tracking postnadir absolute neutrophil counts should be performed to ensure patients receive an appropriate number of filgrastim doses to prevent complications associated with neutropenia/febrile neutropenia.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.