ArticleFrontiers in medicine2023
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review and individual bacterial species level meta-analysis of in vitro studies on the efficacy of ceftazidime/avibactam combined with other antimicrobials against carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2025Pooled it
- Ceftazidime-avibactam as monotherapy or in combination for targeted treatment of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae infections in ICUs: a comparative analysis through counterfactual framework and desirability of outcome ranking.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026Observational
- Epidemiology, treatment and outcomes of antimicrobial-resistant infections in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients.Current opinion in infectious diseases · 2026Review
- Use of Ceftazidime-Avibactam in a Late-Preterm Newborn with Multidrug-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Evaluating the efficacy of ceftazidime/avibactam plus amikacin combination therapy as a carbapenem-sparing agent against ceftazidime/avibactam-resistantAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2026Article
- Precision Approaches to Carbapenem-Resistant Infections in the ICU: Integrating Diagnostics, Stewardship, and Novel Therapies.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Article
- In Vitro Evaluation of Fosfomycin Combinations Against Metallo-β-Lactamase-ProducingAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- Difficult-to-TreatAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Deciphering curcumin's differential inhibition of KPC-3, L2, and CTX-M-15 β-lactamases through binding energetics and structural dynamics.In silico pharmacology · 2025Article
- Susceptibility of various Gram-negative bacteria to antibacterial agents: SMART in China 2019-2020.BMC microbiology · 2024Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Ceftazidime-Avibactam Alone versus Ceftazidime-Avibactam Plus Fosfomycin for the Treatment of Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia and Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: A Multicentric Retrospective Study from the SUSANA Cohort.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Comparison of testing methods assessing the in vitro efficacy of the combination of aztreonam with avibactam on multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli.Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Carbapenem-resistant Methods: We systematically reviewed the relevant literature in CINAHL/MEDLINE, Pubmed, Cochrane, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus until December 1, 2022. Review articles, grey literature, abstracts, comments, editorials, non-peer reviewed articles, non-English articles, and in vitro synergy studies conducted on single isolates were excluded. Results: 22 Discussion: The benefit, if any, of CZA combination regimens in MDR-PA infections is elusive, as very few clinical studies have included these infections. There is no currently documented clinical benefit for the use of CZA combination regimens rather than CZA monotherapy. CZA combined with aztreonam for serious infections due to MBL producers should be evaluated by randomized controlled trials. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=278552, CRD42021278552.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.