ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2023
Diagnostic Value of Pulmonary Ultrasound and Arterial Blood Gas Analysis in Acute Patients with Severe Injuries Complicated by Respiratory Failure-A Retrospective Study.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To investigate the early application of pulmonary ultrasonography and arterial blood gas analysis in critical patients with severe multiple injuries exacerbated by respiratory failure. Patients and Methods: The retrospective selection was performed on 81 patients admitted to our critical care unit between January 2020 and January 2021 with severe multiple injuries rendered worse by respiratory failure. Based on the different examination procedures, the patients were categorised into three groups (n=27): group A; diagnosed with pulmonary ultrasonography, group B; diagnosed with arterial blood gas; and group C; diagnosed with both pulmonary ultrasonography and arterial blood gas analyses. Patients were subsequently divided into a survival group (n = 65) and a death group (n = 16). On an annual basis, patients' prognoses were examined in relation to the predictive value of pulmonary ultrasound. Results: Initial diagnosis, diagnosis, and initial correct treatment times were significantly shorter in groups B and C than group A (P<0.05). In contrast, initial diagnosis time, diagnosis time, and initial correct treatment times were potentially shorter in group C than in group B (P<0.05). Compared to groups B and C, group A had a considerably lower diagnosis rate for the examination methods (P<0.05). The right diaphragm displacement and left diaphragm displacement in the survival group were potentially higher than the LUS score (P < 0.05). In contrast, the survival group's lung ultrasound score (LUS) was considerably lower than the death group's. Statistical analysis showed that the predictive values of right diaphragm displacement, left diaphragm displacement, and mean diaphragm displacement were significant compared with the LUS score. The findings of the receiver operating characteristic curve demonstrated that the right, left, and average diaphragm displacements had high predictive values. Conclusion: In the early evaluation of patients with severe multiple injuries complicated by respiratory failure, pulmonary ultrasonography combined with arterial blood gas analysis is crucial for the rapid diagnosis and prognosis prediction of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.