Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37727499›Full record

ArticleParkinson's disease2023

Qualitative Analysis of Attitudes, Knowledge, and Interest in Research of People with Parkinson's Disease and Their Care Partners Receiving Accessible Research Education.

Maria E Ramos, Suraj Pothineni, Liang Ni, Allison A Bay, Todd Prusin, Madeleine E Hackney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parkinson's disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maria E RamosEmory University College of Arts and Sciences, Atlanta, Georgia.
Suraj PothineniEmory University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Atlanta, Georgia.
Liang NiEmory University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Atlanta, Georgia.
Allison A BayEmory University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Atlanta, Georgia.
Todd PrusinEmory University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Atlanta, Georgia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8199-3205
Madeleine E HackneyEmory University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Atlanta, Georgia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1833-0051

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: People with Parkinson's disease (PWP) and their care partners (CP) are underrepresented in research. Methods: As an eight-week research advocacy training program, TeleDREAMS was designed to increase understanding of, and participation in, clinical research by older adults through topics on the research process. Qualitative analysis was conducted to explore themes from 365 thirty-minute semistructured phone interviews with 32 PWP and 17 CP TeleDREAMS participants. Interviews gauged progress, motivation, and information retention after each weekly module. Results: Eight salient themes were identified from the interviews, including Understanding the Importance of Advocacy and Becoming Cognizant of Past Advocacy Experiences. Conclusions: While some findings aligned with weekly module topics, others, such as stated learning preferences and knowledge acquisition of older adults in an educational program, were unexpected. TeleDREAMS may increase interest in community engagement, research participation, and advocacy roles in marginalized and underrepresented participants.

Identifiers

PMID37727499
PMCPMC10506878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.