ArticleWorld journal of clinical cases2023
Analysis of prognostic factors in patients with emergency sepsis.
Article in World journal of clinical cases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEmergency sepsis is a common and serious infectious disease, and its prognosis is influenced by a number of factors.
aimTo analyse the factors influencing the prognosis of patients with emergency sepsis in order to provide a basis for individualised patient treatment and care. By retrospectively analysing the clinical data collected, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of factors such as age, gender, underlying disease, etiology and site of infection, inflammatory indicators, multi-organ failure, cardiovascular function, therapeutic measures, immune status and severity of infection.
methodsData collection: Clinical data were collected from patients diagnosed with acute sepsis, including basic information, laboratory findings, medical history and treatment options. Variable selection: Variables associated with prognosis were selected, including age, gender, underlying disease, etiology and site of infection, inflammatory indicators, multi-organ failure, cardiovascular function, treatment measures, immune status and severity of infection. Data analysis: The data collected are analysed using appropriate statistical methods such as multiple regression analysis and survival analysis. The impact of each factor on prognosis was assessed according to prognostic indicators, such as survival, length of stay and complication rates.
resultsDescriptive statistics: Descriptive statistics were performed on the data collected from the patients, including their basic characteristics and clinical presentation.
conclusionType 2 diabetes mellitus were independent factors affecting the prognosis of patients with sepsis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.