Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37727466›Full record

ArticleDigital journal of ophthalmology : DJO2023

Impact of phacoemulsification on posterior vitreous detachment formation in eyes with vitreomacular traction.

Marisa G Tieger, Demetrios G Vavvas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital journal of ophthalmology : DJO, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marisa G TiegerRetina Service, Department of Ophthalmology Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Demetrios G VavvasRetina Service, Department of Ophthalmology Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the impact of phacoemulsification on posterior vitreous detachment formation in eyes with vitreomacular traction (VMT) with or without macular holes. Methods: A retrospective search of the medical records was conducted to identify patients with VMT who underwent cataract surgery at Mass Eye and Ear from 2016 to 2021. Patient demographics, ocular comorbidities, and clinical characteristics were extracted from the record, and optical coherence tomography images were assessed to confirm VMT and the presence of a lamellar or full-thickness macular hole (FMTH). Patients who underwent vitrectomy prior to cataract surgery were excluded. Results: A total of 22 patients (15 women [68%]) met inclusion criteria (average age, 71 years). Fifteen eyes had an associated epiretinal membrane (63%), 7 had a lamellar hole (29%), and 8 had an FTMH (33%). Epiretinal membrane was present in 3 of 7 eyes with lamellar holes (43%) and 4 of 8 with a FTMH (50%). No eyes developed a complete posterior vitreous detachment following phacoemulsification. In 2 cases, there was progression of the macular hole stage following phacoemulsification. Ten eyes underwent subsequent pars plana vitrectomy (PPV). There was no statistically significant difference in visual acuity between eyes pre- and post-phacoemulsification; however, there was a statistically significant improvement in visual acuity pre- and post-PPV. Conclusions: Unlike other studies, in this case series of 24 eyes with VMT or VMT with holes, no cases of full posterior vitreous detachment occurred following unremarkable phacoemulsification or YAG capsulotomy.

Indexed as

CataractEpiretinal MembranePhacoemulsificationRetinal PerforationsVitreous DetachmentAgedFemaleHumansRetrospective StudiesTraction

Identifiers

PMID37727466
PMCPMC10506616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.