Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37727455›Full record

Observational studyFrontiers in endocrinology2023

Fine-tuning the dose of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone alfa to individualize treatment in ovulation induction and ovarian stimulation cycles: a real-world database analysis.

Anne E Martini, Stephanie Beall, G David Ball, Brooke Hayward, Thomas D'Hooghe, Mary C Mahony, Fabricio Collares, Allison B Catherino

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anne E MartiniNational Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Stephanie BeallReproductive Endocrinology and Infertility Department, Shady Grove Fertility Center, Rockville, MD, United States.
G David BallSeattle Reproductive Medicine Center, Seattle, WA, United States.
Brooke HaywardUS Medical Affairs Fertility, EMD Serono, Inc., Rockland, MA, United States.
Thomas D'HoogheGlobal Medical Affairs Fertility, Research and Development, Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
Mary C MahonyIndependent Scientific Affairs Consultant, Virginia Beach, VA, United States.
Fabricio CollaresUS Medical Affairs Fertility, EMD Serono, Inc., Rockland, MA, United States.
Allison B CatherinoUS Medical Affairs Fertility, EMD Serono, Inc., Rockland, MA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Fine-tuning of injectable gonadotropin doses during ovulation induction (OI) or ovarian stimulation (OS) treatment cycles with the aim of using doses low enough to minimize the risk of excessive ovarian response while maintaining optimal efficacy may be facilitated by using an adjustable-dose pen injector. We examined the incidence and magnitude of individualized gonadotropin dose adjustments made during cycles of OI or OS, followed by either timed intercourse or intrauterine insemination, with or without oral medications, and assessed the relationship between patient characteristics and dosing changes using real-world evidence. Methods: This was an observational, retrospective cohort study using electronic medical records from a large US database of fertility centers. Data from patients who had undergone a first recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone alfa (r-hFSH-alfa/follitropin alfa) treated OI/OS cycle followed by timed intercourse or intrauterine insemination between 2015 and 2016 were included. Percentages of OI/OS cycles involving r-hFSH-alfa dose adjustments (in increments of ±12.5 IU or greater) with or without oral medications (clomiphene citrate or letrozole) were analyzed. Results: Of 2,832 OI/OS cycles involving r-hFSH-alfa administration, 74.6% included combination treatment with orals; 25.4% involved r-hFSH-alfa alone. As expected, the starting dose of r-hFSH-alfa was lower for cycles that used r-hFSH-alfa with orals than r-hFSH-alfa only cycles (mean [SD]: 74.2 [39.31] vs 139.3 [115.10] IU). Dose changes occurred in 13.7% of r-hFSH-alfa with orals versus 43.9% of r-hFSH-alfa only cycles. Dose adjustment magnitudes ranged from ±12.5 IU to ±450 IU. The smallest adjustment magnitudes (±12.5 IU and ±25 IU) were used frequently and more often for dose increases than for dose decreases. For r-hFSH-alfa with orals and r-hFSH-alfa only cycles, the smallest adjustments were used in 53.5% and 64.5% of cycles with dose increases and in 35.7% and 46.8% of cycles with dose decreases, respectively. Discussion: In OI/OS cycles followed by timed intercourse or intrauterine insemination, r-hFSH-alfa dose adjustments were frequent. In cycles that included orals, r-hFSH-alfa starting doses were lower and dose changes were fewer than with r-hFSH-alfa alone. Smaller dose adjustments facilitate individualized treatment with the goal of reducing the risks of multiple gestation, cycle cancellation, and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.

Indexed as

Follicle Stimulating Hormone, HumanOvarian Hyperstimulation SyndromeFemaleHumansOvulation InductionReproductionRetrospective StudiesFollicle Stimulating Hormone, Humanfertility treatmentfollitropin alfagonadotropin dose adjustmentsindividualized dosingovarian stimulationovulation induction

Identifiers

PMID37727455
PMCPMC10505726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.