Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37727380›Full record

ArticleTransplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation2023

All Expanded Criteria Donor Kidneys are Equal But are Some More Equal Than Others? A Population-Cohort Analysis of UK Transplant Registry Data.

Kamlesh Patel, Anna Brotherton, Daoud Chaudhry, Felicity Evison, Thomas Nieto, Dilan Dabare, Adnan Sharif

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kamlesh PatelDepartment of Nephrology and Transplantation, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Anna BrothertonDepartment of Nephrology and Transplantation, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Daoud ChaudhrySchool of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Felicity EvisonData Science Team, Research Development and Innovation, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Thomas NietoDepartment of Nephrology and Transplantation, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Dilan DabareDepartment of Nephrology and Transplantation, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Adnan SharifDepartment of Nephrology and Transplantation, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Survival outcomes for kidney transplant candidates based on expanded criteria donor (ECD) kidney type is unknown. A retrospective cohort study was undertaken of prospectively collected registry data of all waitlisted kidney failure patients receiving dialysis in the United Kingdom. All patients listed for their first kidney-alone transplant between 2000-2019 were included. Treatment types included; living donor; standard criteria donor (SCD); ECD

Indexed as

Renal InsufficiencyRoutinely Collected Health DataHumansKidneyLiving DonorsRetrospective StudiesUnited Kingdomdeceased donationECDepidemiologyexpanded criteria donorskidney transplant outcomes

Identifiers

PMID37727380
PMCPMC10505656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.