ArticleGynecologic oncology reports2023
Factors associated with adherence to post-treatment follow-up among a cohort of women with acetic acid/Lugol's iodine positive lesions of the cervix in Cameroon: A retrospective cohort study.
Article in Gynecologic oncology reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Follow-up rescreening among women living with human immunodeficiency virus who tested positive and treated for cervical pre-cancer lesions in South Ethiopia.The oncologist · 2026Article
- Prevalence and associated factors of persistent precancerous lesions among women treated for cervical lesions in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.The oncologist · 2025Article
- Comparing a "See-and-Treat" HPV-Based to VIA-Based Cervical Cancer Prevention Strategies Among Women Living with HIV in Cameroon: A Pilot Study.Research square · 2025Article
- Impact of telephone reminders on posttreatment follow-up among women treated for cervical precancers in Cameroon: A randomized controlled trial.Gynecologic oncology reports · 2025Article
- Cervical Precancer Treatment Outcomes in Cameroon.International journal of MCH and AIDS · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Women treated for cervical precancerous lesions have up to a 30 % increased risk of developing cervical cancer compared to women in the general population. The aim of this study was to identify predictors for adherence to follow-up among women treated for precancerous lesions of the cervix in Cameroon. Materials and Methods: The study design was a retrospective cohort analysis of a five-year follow-up for women in Cameroon who were initially treated for cervical precancer lesions in 2013. Logistic regression models were used to determine factors associated with adherence to post-treatment follow-up. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: Of the 344 women treated in 2013, 154 (44.77 %) never returned for a single post-treatment follow-up in five years. Marital status was the only variable statistically significantly associated with 5-year post-treatment follow-up adherence. women who had ever been married were 0.36 times (0.14 0.93)); p = 0. 0.035] less likely to adhere to post-treatment follow-up compared to women who have never been married. Although age was not statistically significant, women in the age group 30-49 years had some significance and they were 60 % [aOR, 95 %CI: 0.40 (0.18 0.89); p = 0.024] less likely to adhere to post-treatment follow-up when compared to women who were<30 years. Conclusion: Only about half of the women treated for cervical precancer in this cohort returned for post-treatment follow-up. Conducting needs assessments among these populations that are less likely to adhere to follow-up will allow us to implement and test strategies to improve adherence to follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.