ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023
Evaluation of CT features for differentiating consolidation pattern of pulmonary MALT lymphoma from pneumonic-type lung adenocarcinoma.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A case of pulmonary mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma in a patient with a history of idiopathic lymphocytic interstitial pneumonia (iLIP).General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery cases · 2025Article
- Clinical analysis of pulmonary mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma coexisting with lung cancer.BMC cancer · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: In clinical practice, the consolidation pattern of pulmonary mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (C-MALT) was often misdiagnosed as pneumonic-type lung adenocarcinoma (P-LADC). However, the mainstay of treatment and prognosis of these two diseases are different. The purpose of this study was to distinguish C-MALT from P-LADC by pre-treatment chest computed tomography (CT) features. Patients and methods: A total of 31 patients with C-MALT (15 men and 16 women; mean age, 61.1 ± 11.2 years) and 58 patients with P-LADC (34 men and 24 women; mean age, 68.6 ± 7.4 years) confirmed by pathology who underwent contrast-enhanced chest CT were retrospectively enrolled from September 2014 to February 2023. Detailed clinical and CT characteristics of the two groups were evaluated. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the effectiveness of statistically significant variables in distinguishing C-MALT from P-LADC. Results: The average age of C-MALT was younger than P-LADC patients (p<0.001). With regard to CT features, bronchiectasis within the consolidation was more common in the C-MALT group than the P-LADC group [83.87% (26 of 31) vs 20.69% (12 of 58), p<0.001]; whereas lymph nodes enlargement [75.86% (44 of 58) vs 9.68% (3 of 31), p<0.001] and pleural effusion [43.10% (25of 58) vs 19.35% (6 of 31), p=0.025] were more frequently observed in the P-LADC group than C-MALT group. The predictors with p<0.05 (age, bronchiectasis, lymph node enlargement, and pleural effusion) were used to construct a logistic regression model in discriminating C-MALT from P-LADC, the area under curve (AUC), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy were 0.9555, 86.67%, 91.53%, 83.87%, 93.10%, and 89.89%, respectively. Conclusion: C-MALT and P-LADC have differential clinical and CT features. An adequate understanding of these different characteristics can contribute to the early accurate diagnosis of C-MALT and provide an appropriate therapeutic strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.