ArticleCureus2023
Comparison of Postoperative Complications of Open Versus Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy According to the Modified Clavien-Dindo Classification System.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Outcome of Active Aspiration Versus Simple Compression to Remove Residual Gas From Abdominal Cavity in Reducing Pain After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Comparison of Gallbladder Extraction Via the Subxiphoid Port and the Infraumbilical Port During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Registry-Based Analysis of Cholecystectomy Outcomes at a German University Hospital and Nationwide Data.Visceral medicine · 2026Article
- Risk Factors Analysis and Nomogram Prediction Model Construction for Pulmonary Infection After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.Infection and drug resistance · 2026Article
- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Outcomes of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Compared to the Open Procedure in Patients with Gallbladder Disease.Avicenna journal of medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThough laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become a gold standard management technique for gallbladder diseases, an open approach can also be used for patients having complicated gallbladder disease. Post-cholecystectomy complications are well-documented in existing English scientific literature but are not well understood according to the grade of intervention required to treat those complications.
objectiveTo compare the postoperative complications of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy according to the modified Clavien-Dindo classification (MCDC) system. MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective study was conducted at the Department of General Surgery, Unit - III, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore, comprising the data of patients operated between July 01, 2021, and December 31, 2021, after departmental approval # SU-III/73/LGH, dated April 1, 2022. Patients with the definitive diagnosis of acute cholecystitis, chronic cholecystitis, cholelithiasis, and cholecysto-duodenal fistula were included, while cases of choledocholithiasis and, gall bladder carcinoma were excluded from this study. Eighty patients met the inclusion criteria, with 40 patients in each group of open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Information for the data set of age, gender, history of surgical procedure, immediate and late outcome, length of surgery, and MCDC grade were collected. Low-grade complications were Grade I and Grade II, while Grades III to V were high-grade.
resultsThe mean age of included patients was 42.52 ± 8.76 and 40.025 ± 8.12 years, in the open and laparoscopic group, with 80% and 90% female preponderance, respectively. Grade I and Grade II complications occurred in both groups of patients, with Grade III only in patients who underwent open cholecystectomy. None of the patients from each group developed Grade IV or Grade V complications. Among 40 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy, 35% of the patients developed low-grade complications, whereas 40% of the patients developed low-grade complications after open cholecystectomy, with respiratory complications being the most common. High-grade complications after open cholecystectomy were found among 2.5% of patients, whereas no patients developed high-grade complications following the laparoscopic approach.
conclusionPatients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy are less prone to develop complications than patients undergoing open cholecystectomy, hence requiring low-grade interventions of surgical and non-surgical types. MCDC is a valuable tool for assessing surgical complications and can help improve patient outcomes by providing a standardized method for reporting and comparing complication rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.