Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37727092›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2023

Evidence for cryptic sex in parthenogenetic stick insects of the genus

Susana Freitas, Darren J Parker, Marjorie Labédan, Zoé Dumas, Tanja Schwander

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Loss, persistence and reversal of phenotypic traits.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  2. Rare sex punctuates strict asexual reproduction in the clonal raider ant,bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Sexual conflict as a constraint on asexual reproduction: an empirical review.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Interplay of asexual and sexual reproduction in bifunctional insects.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Susana FreitasDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7356-4929
Darren J ParkerDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4027-7779
Marjorie LabédanDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Zoé DumasDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Tanja SchwanderDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1945-5374
University of Lausanne · CHBangor University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obligately parthenogenetic species are expected to be short lived since the lack of sex and recombination should translate into a slower adaptation rate and increased accumulation of deleterious alleles. Some, however, are thought to have been reproducing without males for millions of years. It is not clear how these old parthenogens can escape the predicted long-term costs of parthenogenesis, but an obvious explanation is cryptic sex. In this study, we screen for signatures of cryptic sex in eight populations of four parthenogenetic species of

Indexed as

InsectaParthenogenesisAllelesAnimalsFemaleGenotypeHumansLinkage DisequilibriumMaleasexualitycryptic sexgene flowinsectsparthenogenesisTimema

Identifiers

PMID37727092
PMCPMC10509586
OpenAlexW4386878619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.