Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37726838›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial resistance and infection control2023

Association of antimicrobial perioperative prophylaxis with cefuroxime plus metronidazole or amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and surgical site infections in colorectal surgery.

Elisavet Stavropoulou, Andrew Atkinson, Marie-Christine Eisenring, Christoph A Fux, Jonas Marschall, Laurence Senn, Nicolas Troillet

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial resistance and infection control, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Peri-Operative Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Modulates CD4Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Elisavet StavropoulouService of Infectious Diseases, Central Institute, Valais Hospital, Sion, Switzerland.
Andrew AtkinsonDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Bern University Hospital, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Marie-Christine EisenringService of Infectious Diseases, Central Institute, Valais Hospital, Sion, Switzerland.
Christoph A FuxDivision of Infectious Diseases and Infection Prevention, Kantonsspital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland.
Jonas MarschallDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Bern University Hospital, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Laurence Senn *Swissnoso, National Center for Infection Prevention, Bern, Switzerland. Laurence.Senn@chuv.ch.
Nicolas Troillet *Service of Infectious Diseases, Central Institute, Valais Hospital, Sion, Switzerland.
Hôpital du Valais · CHUniversity of Bern · CHKantonsspital Aarau · CHUniversity Hospital of Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare intravenous (IV) amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (A/CA) to IV cefuroxime plus metronidazole (C + M) for preventing surgical site infections (SSI) in colorectal surgery.

backgroundGiven their spectra that include most Enterobacterales and anaerobes, C + M is commonly recommended as prophylaxis of SSI in colorectal surgery. A/CA offers good coverage of Enterobacterales and anaerobes as well, but, in contrast to C + M, it also includes Enterococcus faecalis which is also isolated from patients with SSI and could trigger anastomotic leakage.

methodsData from a Swiss SSI surveillance program were used to compare SSI rates after class II (clean contaminated) colorectal surgery between patients who received C + M and those who received A/CA. We employed multivariable logistic regression to adjust for potential confounders, along with propensity score matching to adjust for group imbalance.

resultsFrom 2009 to 2018, 27,922 patients from 127 hospitals were included. SSI was diagnosed in 3132 (11.2%): 278/1835 (15.1%) in those who received A/CA and 2854/26,087 (10.9%) in those who received C + M (p < 0.001). The crude OR for SSI in the A/CA group as compared to C + M was 1.45 [CI 95% 1.21-1.75]. The adjusted OR was 1.49 [1.24-1.78]. This finding persisted in a 1:1 propensity score matched cohort of 1835 patients pairs with an OR of 1.60 [1.28-2.00]. Other factors independently associated with SSI were an ASA score > 2, a longer duration of operation, and a reoperation for a non-infectious complication. Protective factors were female sex, older age, antibiotic prophylaxis received 60 to 30 min before surgery, elective operation, and endoscopic approach.

conclusionsDespite its activity against enterococci, A/CA was less effective than C + M for preventing SSI, suggesting that it should not be a first choice antibiotic prophylaxis for colorectal surgery.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsColorectal SurgeryGammaproteobacteriaAmoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate CombinationCefuroximeFemaleHumansMaleMetronidazoleSurgical Wound InfectionAmoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate CombinationAnti-Infective AgentsCefuroximeMetronidazoleAmoxicillin/clavulanic acidAntibiotic prophylaxisCefuroximeColorectal surgeryMetronidazoleSurgical site infection

Identifiers

PMID37726838
PMCPMC10510121
OpenAlexW4386844781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.