ArticleJournal of intensive care2023
Ultrasonographic evaluation of the diaphragm in critically ill patients to predict invasive mechanical ventilation.
Article in Journal of intensive care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07323472 (Analysis of Respiratory Drive Activation, Ventilation, and Pulmonary Aeration Resulting From Body Lateralization in Critically Ill Patients Under Mechanical Ventilation), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Analysis of Respiratory Drive Activation, Ventilation, and Pulmonary Aeration Resulting From Body Lateralization in Critically Ill Patients Under Mechanical Ventilation
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diaphragm thickening fraction as a predictor of the need for ventilatory support in the emergency department: an observational pilot study.Journal of ultrasonography · 2026Article
- Echocardiography in the Ventilated Patient: What the Clinician Has to Know.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Efficacy of ultrasonographic diaphragmatic parameters in distinguishing diaphragmatic dysfunction in cats.Journal of feline medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- Diaphragmatic Dynamics Assessed by Bedside Ultrasound Predict Extubation in the Intensive Care Unit: A Prospective Observational Study.International journal of general medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDiaphragm dysfunction is common in critically ill patients and associated with poorer outcomes. The function of the diaphragm can be evaluated at the bedside by measuring diaphragmatic excursion using ultrasonography. In this study, we investigated the ability of right-sided diaphragmatic excursion (RDE) to predict the need for invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV).
methodsCritically ill patients aged 18 years and older who presented to our emergency department between May 20, 2021 and May 19, 2022 and underwent measurement of RDE within 10 min of arrival were enrolled in this prospective study. The ability of RDE to predict the need for IMV was assessed by multivariable logistic regression and analysis of the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUROC).
resultsA total of 314 patients were enrolled in the study; 113 (35.9%) of these patients required IMV. An increase of RDE value per each 0.1 cm was identified to be an independent predictor of IMV (adjusted odds ratio 0.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.04-0.17, p < 0.001; AUROC 0.850, 95% CI 0.807-0.894). The RDE cutoff value was 1.2 cm (sensitivity 82.3%, 95% CI 74.0-88.8; specificity 78.1%, 95% CI 71.7-83.6). Time on a ventilator was significantly longer when the RDE was ≤ 1.2 cm (13 days [interquartile range 5, 27] versus 5 days [interquartile range 3, 8], p = 0.006).
conclusionsIn this study, RDE had a good ability to predict the need for IMV in critically ill patients. The optimal RDE cutoff value was 1.2 cm. Its benefit in patient management requires further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.