Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37726732›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2023

Recognising socio-cultural barriers while seeking early detection services for breast cancer: a study from a Universal Health Coverage setting in India.

Riya Sawhney, Priyansh Nathani, Priti Patil, Prashant Bhandarkar, Deepa Kizhakke Veetil, Jubina Balan Venghateri, Nobhojit Roy, Anita Gadgil

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Riya SawhneyWHO Collaborating Centre for Research in Surgical Care Delivery in Low and Middle-Income Countries, Mumbai, India.
Priyansh NathaniWHO Collaborating Centre for Research in Surgical Care Delivery in Low and Middle-Income Countries, Mumbai, India.
Priti PatilDepartment of Statistics, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC) Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Prashant BhandarkarDepartment of Statistics, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC) Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Deepa Kizhakke VeetilDepartment of Minimal Access, General, Gastrointestinal and Bariatric Surgery, Manipal Hospitals, Delhi, India.
Jubina Balan VenghateriWHO Collaborating Centre for Research in Surgical Care Delivery in Low and Middle-Income Countries, Mumbai, India.
Nobhojit RoyDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institute, 17177, Stockholm, Sweden. nobhojit.roy@ki.se.
Anita GadgilThe George Institute of Global Health, Delhi, India.
Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer · INBhabha Atomic Research Center Hospital · INBhabha Atomic Research Centre · INGeorge Institute for Global Health · INKarolinska Institutet · SEManipal Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast cancer is the commonest cancer among women in India, yet the uptake of early detection programs is poor. This leads to late presentation, advanced stage at the time of diagnosis, and high mortality. Poor accessibility and affordability are the most commonly cited barriers to screening: we analyse socio-cultural factors influencing the uptake of early detection programmes in a Universal Health Coverage (UHC) setting in India, where geographical and financial barriers were mitigated.

methodsTwo hundred seventy-two women engaging in an awareness-based early detection program were recruited by randomization as the participant (P) group. A further 272 women who did not participate in the early detection programme were recruited as non-participants (NP). None of the groups were previously screened for breast cancer. Interviews were conducted using a 19-point questionnaire, consisting of closed-ended questions regarding demographics and social, cultural, spiritual and trust-related barriers.

resultsThe overall awareness about breast cancer was high among both groups. None of the groups reported accessibility-related barriers. Participants were more educated (58.09% vs 47.43%, p = 0.02) and belonged to nuclear families (83.59% vs 76.75%, p = 0.05). Although they reported more fear of isolation due to stigma (25% vs 14%, p = 0.001), they had greater knowledge about breast cancer and trust in the health system compared to non-participants.

conclusionsThe major socio-cultural barriers identified were joint family setups, lower education and awareness, and lack of trust in healthcare professionals. As more countries progress towards UHC, recognising socio-cultural barriers to seeking breast health services is essential in order to formulate context-specific solutions to increase the uptake of early detection and screening services.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsBreastEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansIndiaUniversal Health InsuranceBreast cancerIndiaScreening barriersUniversal health coverage

Identifiers

PMID37726732
PMCPMC10507865
OpenAlexW4386864303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.