Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37726680›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2023

Exploring the variable importance in random forests under correlations: a general concept applied to donor organ quality in post-transplant survival.

Christoph Wies, Robert Miltenberger, Gunter Grieser, Antje Jahn-Eimermacher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christoph WiesDepartment of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Darmstadt University of Applied Sciences, Schöfferstraße 3, Darmstadt, 64295, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7136-298X
Robert MiltenbergerDepartment of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Darmstadt University of Applied Sciences, Schöfferstraße 3, Darmstadt, 64295, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7385-1151
Gunter GrieserDepartment of Computer Science, Darmstadt University of Applied Sciences, Schöfferstraße 3, Darmstadt, 64295, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8489-1589
Antje Jahn-EimermacherDepartment of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Darmstadt University of Applied Sciences, Schöfferstraße 3, Darmstadt, 64295, Germany. antje.jahn@h-da.de.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2397-5340

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Random Forests are a powerful and frequently applied Machine Learning tool. The permutation variable importance (VIMP) has been proposed to improve the explainability of such a pure prediction model. It describes the expected increase in prediction error after randomly permuting a variable and disturbing its association with the outcome. However, VIMPs measure a variable's marginal influence only, that can make its interpretation difficult or even misleading. In the present work we address the general need for improving the explainability of prediction models by exploring VIMPs in the presence of correlated variables. In particular, we propose to use a variable's residual information for investigating if its permutation importance partially or totally originates from correlated predictors. Hypotheses tests are derived by a resampling algorithm that can further support results by providing test decisions and p-values. In simulation studies we show that the proposed test controls type I error rates. When applying the methods to a Random Forest analysis of post-transplant survival after kidney transplantation, the importance of kidney donor quality for predicting post-transplant survival is shown to be high. However, the transplant allocation policy introduces correlations with other well-known predictors, which raises the concern that the importance of kidney donor quality may simply originate from these predictors. By using the proposed method, this concern is addressed and it is demonstrated that kidney donor quality plays an important role in post-transplant survival, regardless of correlations with other predictors.

Indexed as

Kidney TransplantationRandom ForestAlgorithmsComputer SimulationHumansMachine LearningKidney transplantationPermutation variable importanceRandom forestResampling test

Identifiers

PMID37726680
PMCPMC10507897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.