Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37726611›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2022

CMR findings after COVID-19 and after COVID-19-vaccination-same but different?

Patrick Doeblin, Constantin Jahnke, Matthias Schneider, Sarah Al-Tabatabaee, Collin Goetze, Karl J Weiss, Radu Tanacli, Alessandro Faragli, Undine Witt, Christian Stehning and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Abnormal coronary vascular response in patients with long COVID syndrome - a case-control study using oxygenation-sensitive cardiovascular magnetic resonance.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2025
    Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Patrick DoeblinDepartment of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin, Berlin, Germany. doeblin@dhzb.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1511-8015
Constantin JahnkeDepartment of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Matthias SchneiderDepartment of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Sarah Al-TabatabaeeDepartment of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Collin GoetzeDepartment of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Karl J WeissDepartment of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Radu TanacliDepartment of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Alessandro FaragliDepartment of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Undine WittDepartment of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Christian StehningClinical Science, Philips Healthcare, Hamburg, Germany.
Franziska SeidelDepartment of Congenital Heart Disease, German Heart Center Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Ahmed ElsanhouryDZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Titus KühneDZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Carsten TschöpeDZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Burkert PieskeDepartment of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Sebastian KelleDepartment of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité · DEHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DEGerman Centre for Cardiovascular Research · DEPhilips (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac involvement has been described in varying proportions of patients recovered from COVID-19 and proposed as a potential cause of prolonged symptoms, often described as post-COVID or long COVID syndrome. Recently, cardiac complications have been reported from COVID-19 vaccines as well. We aimed to compare CMR-findings in patients with clinical cardiac symptoms after COVID-19 and after vaccination. From May 2020 to May 2021, we included 104 patients with suspected cardiac involvement after COVID-19 who received a clinically indicated cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) examination at a high-volume center. The mean time from first positive PCR to CMR was 112  ± 76 days. During their COVID-19 disease, 21% of patients required hospitalization, 17% supplemental oxygen and 7% mechanical ventilation. In 34 (32.7%) of patients, CMR provided a clinically relevant diagnosis: Isolated pericarditis in 10 (9.6%), %), acute myocarditis (both LLC) in 7 (6.7%), possible myocarditis (one LLC) in 5 (4.8%), ischemia in 4 (3.8%), recent infarction in 2 (1.9%), old infarction in 4 (3.8%), dilated cardiomyopathy in 3 (2.9%), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in 2 (1.9%), aortic stenosis, pleural tumor and mitral valve prolapse each in 1 (1.0%). Between May 2021 and August 2021, we examined an additional 27 patients with suspected cardiac disease after COVID-19 vaccination. Of these, CMR provided at least one diagnosis in 22 (81.5%): Isolated pericarditis in 4 (14.8%), acute myocarditis in 9 (33.3%), possible myocarditis (acute or subsided) in 6 (22.2%), ischemia in 3 (37.5% out of 8 patients with stress test), isolated pericardial effusion (> 10 mm) and non-compaction-cardiomyopathy each in 1 (3.7%). The number of myocarditis diagnoses after COVID-19 was highly dependent on the stringency of the myocarditis criteria applied. When including only cases of matching edema and LGE and excluding findings in the right ventricular insertion site, the number of cases dropped from 7 to 2 while the number of cases after COVID-19 vaccination remained unchanged at 9. While myocarditis is an overall rare side effect after COVID-19 vaccination, it is currently the leading cause of myocarditis in our institution due to the large number of vaccinations applied over the last months. Contrary to myocarditis after vaccination, LGE and edema in myocarditis after COVID-19 often did not match or were confined to the RV-insertion site. Whether these cases truly represent myocarditis or a different pathological entity is to be determined in further studies.

Indexed as

COVID-19MyocarditisCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyPost-Acute COVID-19 SyndromePredictive Value of TestsCOVID-19 VaccinesCMRCOVID-19COVID-19 vaccinesLong COVIDMyocarditisPericarditis

Identifiers

PMID37726611
PMCPMC9097142
OpenAlexW4280555808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.