Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37726601›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2022

Feature tracking cardiovascular magnetic resonance reveals recovery of atrial function after acute myocarditis.

J N Schneider, C Jahnke, E Cavus, C Chevalier, S Bohnen, U K Radunski, K A Riedl, E Tahir, G Adam, P Kirchhof and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Clinical and prognostic impact of left atrial strain in non-ischemic cardiomyopathies.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

J N SchneiderDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany. j.schneider@uke.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0414-6181
C JahnkeDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
E CavusDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
C ChevalierDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
S BohnenDepartment of Cardiology, Asklepios Clinic St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany.
U K RadunskiDepartment of Cardiology, Regio Clinics Pinneberg and Elmshorn, Hamburg, Germany.
K A RiedlDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
E TahirDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
G AdamDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
P KirchhofDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
S BlankenbergDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
G K LundDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
K MüllerleileDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Follow-up after acute myocarditis is important to detect persisting myocardial dysfunction. However, recovery of atrial function has not been evaluated after acute myocarditis so far. Thirty-five patients with strictly defined acute myocarditis underwent cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR, 1.5 T) in the acute stage at baseline (BL) and at 3 months follow-up (FU). The study population included 13 patients with biopsy-proven "cardiomyopathy-like" myocarditis (CLM) and 22 patients with "infarct-like" (ILM) clinical presentation. CMR feature tracking (FT) was performed on conventional cine SSFP sequences. Median LA-GLS increased from 33.2 (14.5; 39.2) at BL to 37.0% (25.2; 44.1, P = 0.0018) at FU in the entire study population. Median LA-GLS also increased from 36.7 (26.5; 42.3) at BL to 41.3% (34.5; 44.8, P = 0.0262) at FU in the ILM subgroup and from 11.3 (6.4; 21.1) at BL to 21.4% (14.2; 30.7, P = 0.0186) at FU in the CLM subgroup. Median RA-GLS significantly increased from BL with 30.8 (22.5; 37.0) to FU with 33.7% (26.8; 45.4, P = 0.0027) in the entire study population. Median RA-GLS also significantly increased from 32.7 (25.8; 41.0) at BL to 35.8% (27.7; 48.0, P = 0.0495) at FU in the ILM subgroup and from 22.8 (13.1; 33.9) at BL to 31.0% (26.0; 40.8, P = 0.0266) at FU in the CLM subgroup. Our findings demonstrate recovery of LA and RA function by CMR-FT strain analyses in patients after acute myocarditis independent from clinical presentation. Monitoring of atrial strain could be an important tool for an individual assessment of healing after acute myocarditis.

Indexed as

MyocarditisAtrial FunctionHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyPredictive Value of TestsAtrial strain analysisCardiomyopathy-like myocarditisCMR-feature-trackingInfarct-like myocarditis

Identifiers

PMID37726601
PMCPMC10509057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.