Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37726305›Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2023

Opiorphin as a biomarker of orofacial conditions: a meta-analysis.

André Luís Porporatti, Claudia Aparecida de Oliveira Machado, Ivan Alajbeg, Iva Z Alajbeg, Elzbieta Paszynska, Monika Dmitrzak-Weglarz, Adeline Braud, Yves Boucher

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

André Luís PorporattiLaboratoire de Neurobiologie OroFaciale (LabNOF, EA7543), Service Odontologie, Université Paris Cité, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié Salpêtrière-APHP, 47-83 Bd de l'Hôpital, 75651, Paris Cedex 13, France. andreporporatti@yahoo.com.br.
Claudia Aparecida de Oliveira MachadoFederal University of Uberlandia, Uberlandia, Brazil.
Ivan AlajbegOral Medicine, School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Iva Z AlajbegProsthetic Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Elzbieta PaszynskaDepartment of Integrated Dentistry, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Monika Dmitrzak-WeglarzDepartment of Psychiatric Genetics, Department of Psychiatry, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Adeline BraudLaboratoire de Neurobiologie OroFaciale (LabNOF, EA7543), Service Odontologie, Université Paris Cité, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié Salpêtrière-APHP, 47-83 Bd de l'Hôpital, 75651, Paris Cedex 13, France.
Yves BoucherLaboratoire de Neurobiologie OroFaciale (LabNOF, EA7543), Service Odontologie, Université Paris Cité, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié Salpêtrière-APHP, 47-83 Bd de l'Hôpital, 75651, Paris Cedex 13, France.
Poznan University of Medical Sciences · PLUniversité Paris Cité · FRUniversity of Zagreb · HRSorbonne Université · FRUniversidade Federal de Uberlândia · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this meta-analysis was to answer the following question: "Are there any differences in opiorphin biomarker concentrations between different orofacial conditions and controls?". Two reviewers searched for observational studies that evaluated the levels of opiorphin in orofacial conditions, annotated in seven main databases and three that compile gray literature. Of the 443 articles obtained initially, 8 met the inclusion criteria for quantitative analyses. Relative percentages showed a mean 24.1% higher opiorphin concentration in chronic conditions (Burning Mouth Syndrome, Oral Potentially Malignant Diseases and Temporomandibular Disorder) compared to controls; 33.2% higher opiorphin in sustained pain (Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis, Symptomatic Apical Periodontitis, Painful Oral Soft-tissue conditions); and 21.7% higher opiorphin after stimuli (Corneal Foreign Body, Capsaicin). Meta-analysis revealed a standardized mean difference of 0.62 [0.02, 1.22] in the absolute concentration of opiorphin in saliva for the chronic group compared to the control. The analogous values for the sustained group and the stimulated group were 2.24 [0.34, 4.14] and 0.43 [0.00, 0.85], respectively. No differences in opiorphin levels were found for 'after Local Anesthesia before Tooth Extraction' or for apicoectomy. Based on the available evidence, in general, a statistically higher level of opiorphin is found in orofacial conditions. Salivary opiorphin levels are elevated in chronic, persisted and acute pain conditions, presumably reflecting a physiological homeostatic adaptative response to different conditions such as stress or pain. Salivary opiorphin might therefore be used as a valuable biomarker in several oral disorders.

Indexed as

AcclimatizationAcute PainAdaptation, PhysiologicalBiomarkersHumansOligopeptidesSalivary Proteins and PeptidesBiomarkersglutaminyl-arginyl-phenylalanyl-seryl-arginineOligopeptidesSalivary Proteins and Peptides

Identifiers

PMID37726305
PMCPMC10509258
OpenAlexW4386856446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.