Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37726262›Full record

ReviewCell death discovery2023

Stromal vascular fraction in the treatment of myositis.

S Gandolfi, B Pileyre, L Drouot, I Dubus, I Auquit-Auckbur, J Martinet

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell death discovery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Histological Comparison of Lipofilling and Hyaluronic Acid Filler Injection 30 Days after Simulation in Rats.Doklady biological sciences : proceedings of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Biological sciences sections · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S Gandolfi *Univ Rouen Normandie, INSERM U1234, FOCIS Center of Excellence PAn'THER, F-76000, Rouen, France.
B Pileyre *Univ Rouen Normandie, INSERM U1234, FOCIS Center of Excellence PAn'THER, F-76000, Rouen, France. Baptiste.pileyre@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1848-6566
L DrouotUniv Rouen Normandie, INSERM U1234, FOCIS Center of Excellence PAn'THER, F-76000, Rouen, France.
I DubusUniv Rouen Normandie, INSERM U1234, FOCIS Center of Excellence PAn'THER, F-76000, Rouen, France.
I Auquit-AuckburUniv Rouen Normandie, INSERM U1234, FOCIS Center of Excellence PAn'THER, CHU Rouen, Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, F-76000, Rouen, France.
J MartinetUniv Rouen Normandie, INSERM U1234, FOCIS Center of Excellence PAn'THER, CHU Rouen, Department of Immunology and Biotherapy, F-76000, Rouen, France.
Inserm · FR

Funding

Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale (Foundation for Medical Research in France) FDM201806006523
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Muscle regeneration is a physiological process that converts satellite cells into mature myotubes under the influence of an inflammatory environment progressively replaced by an anti-inflammatory environment, with precise crosstalk between immune and muscular cells. If the succession of these phases is disturbed, the immune system can sometimes become auto-reactive, leading to chronic muscular inflammatory diseases, such as myositis. The triggers of these autoimmune myopathies remain mostly unknown, but the main mechanisms of pathogenesis are partially understood. They involve chronic inflammation, which could be associated with an auto-reactive immune response, and gradually with a decrease in the regenerative capacities of the muscle, leading to its degeneration, fibrosis and vascular architecture deterioration. Immunosuppressive treatments can block the first part of the process, but sometimes muscle remains weakened, or even still deteriorates, due to the exhaustion of its capacities. For patients refractory to immunosuppressive therapies, mesenchymal stem cells have shown interesting effects but their use is limited by their availability. Stromal vascular fraction, which can easily be extracted from adipose tissue, has shown good tolerance and possible therapeutic benefits in several degenerative and autoimmune diseases. However, despite the increasing use of stromal vascular fraction, the therapeutically active components within this heterogeneous cellular product are ill-defined and the mechanisms by which this therapy might be active remain insufficiently understood. We review herein the current knowledge on the mechanisms of action of stromal vascular fraction and hypothesise on how it could potentially respond to some of the unmet treatment needs of refractory myositis.

Identifiers

PMID37726262
PMCPMC10509179
OpenAlexW4386849303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.