Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37726172›Full record

ArticleBJGP open2024

Professionals' treatment goals for long-term benzodiazepine and Z-drugs management: a qualitative study.

Pauline Van Ngoc, Melissa Ceuterick, Jean-Luc Belche, Beatrice Scholtes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJGP open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pauline Van NgocResearch Unit of Primary Care and Health, Department of General Medicine, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium pauline.vanngoc@uliege.be.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0925-9994
Melissa CeuterickHedera, Department of Sociology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1376-9524
Jean-Luc BelcheResearch Unit of Primary Care and Health, Department of General Medicine, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1720-6289
Beatrice ScholtesResearch Unit of Primary Care and Health, Department of General Medicine, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5274-822X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBenzodiazepines and Z-drugs (BZD/Z) are frequently prescribed for longer than recommended. Through their interactions with patients taking BZD/Z, primary care and mental health professionals play a key role in the management of this medication.

aimTo explore how primary care and mental health care professionals set treatment goals with users of long-term BZD/Z. DESIGN &

settingA qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with professionals from mental health, addiction care, and primary care practices in Belgium.

methodSemi-structured interviews were conducted, online and in person, with 24 professionals working in mental health and primary care. Inductive thematic content analysis was performed.

resultsSeven themes were identified from the analysis. Professionals tended not to use the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-V) standard to diagnose a BZD/Z substance use disorder. They described criteria based on their experience. They identified diverse types of patients that influence their choice of treatment goals. Professionals appeared to position themselves according to their own treatment goals for their patients, either by promoting the goal of abstinence or harm reduction. Some of them reported feeling trapped into continuing to prescribe and considered BZD/Z withdrawal to be difficult. Some were afraid to engage in a conversation that might break the bond of trust with the patient. Few professionals mentioned patient participation in the treatment goal setting. They asked for targeted withdrawal recommendations, perceiving the current recommendations to be too broad.

conclusionWhether primary care or mental health care professionals are more in favour of a total abstinence or a harm reduction approach to BZD/Z, professionals should be guided towards greater patient participation in setting and evaluating goals with patients taking BZD/Z.

Indexed as

benzodiazepinesgoal-oriented careprimary health carequalitative research

Identifiers

PMID37726172
PMCPMC11169967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.