Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37726122›Full record

Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2023

Effect of invitation letter in language of origin on screening attendance: randomised controlled trial in BreastScreen Norway.

Solveig Hofvind, Nadia Iqbal, Jonas E Thy, Gunhild Mangerud, Sameer Bhargava, Sophia Zackrisson, Paula Berstad

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT04672265 (A Randomized Trial to Increase Access to Breast Cancer Screening by Invitation Language Among Immigrants in Norway), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04672265 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

A Randomized Trial to Increase Access to Breast Cancer Screening by Invitation Language Among Immigrants in Norway

TypeinterventionalSponsorOslo University HospitalRan2021 to 2030Enrolled11,355ConditionsCancer ScreeningArmsMother tongue and Norwegian
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Solveig HofvindThe Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-0178-8939
Nadia IqbalThe Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.
Jonas E ThyThe Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.
Gunhild MangerudThe Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.
Sameer BhargavaThe Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.
Sophia ZackrissonDepartment of Medical Imaging and Physiology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
Paula BerstadThe Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore attendance at organised mammographic screening among immigrant groups that received an invitation letter and information leaflet (invitation) in their language of origin and Norwegian compared with Norwegian only.

designRandomised controlled trial.

settingPopulation based screening programme for breast cancer in Norway (BreastScreen Norway), which invites women aged 50-69 to two-view mammographic screening biennially.

participantsAll women invited to BreastScreen Norway in the study period April 2021 to June 2022 whose language of origin was Arabic (women born in Algeria, Egypt, Lebanon, Iraq, Palestine, Sudan, Syria, Tunisia, or Morocco), English (women born in the Philippines), Polish (women born in Poland), Somali (women born in Somalia), or Urdu (women born in Pakistan) (n=11 347).

interventionThe study group received an invitation to screening in their language of origin and in Norwegian, whereas the control group received an invitation in Norwegian only during the study period.

main outcome measureAttendance at BreastScreen Norway during the study period.

resultsOverall attendance was 46.5% (2642/5683) in the study group and 47.4% (2682/5664) in the control group. No statistical differences in attendance were observed after stratification by language of invitation, age at invitation, or years since immigration.

conclusionsNo difference in attendance was observed between immigrant women invited to BreastScreen Norway in their language of origin and in Norwegian compared with Norwegian only. Several barriers to cancer screening may exist among immigrants, and translating the invitation is probably only a part of a complex explanation.

trial registrationNCT04672265. CLINICALTRIALS: gov NCT04672265.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsEmigrants and ImmigrantsArabsFemaleHumansLanguageNorway

Identifiers

PMID37726122
PMCPMC10507477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.