Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37726116›Full record

ArticleCMAJ open

Physician and administrator experience of preparing to implement Ontario's intensive care unit Triage Emergency Standard of Care during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study.

Brandon A Heidinger, Ariane Downar, Andrea Frolic, James Downar, Sarina R Isenberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CMAJ open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Brandon A HeidingerBruyère Research Institute (Heidinger, A. Downar, J. Downar, Isenberg), Ottawa, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine (Frolic), McMaster University; Hamilton Health Sciences (Frolic), Hamilton, Ont.; Division of Palliative Care (J. Downar, Isenberg), Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.
Ariane DownarBruyère Research Institute (Heidinger, A. Downar, J. Downar, Isenberg), Ottawa, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine (Frolic), McMaster University; Hamilton Health Sciences (Frolic), Hamilton, Ont.; Division of Palliative Care (J. Downar, Isenberg), Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.
Andrea FrolicBruyère Research Institute (Heidinger, A. Downar, J. Downar, Isenberg), Ottawa, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine (Frolic), McMaster University; Hamilton Health Sciences (Frolic), Hamilton, Ont.; Division of Palliative Care (J. Downar, Isenberg), Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.
James DownarBruyère Research Institute (Heidinger, A. Downar, J. Downar, Isenberg), Ottawa, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine (Frolic), McMaster University; Hamilton Health Sciences (Frolic), Hamilton, Ont.; Division of Palliative Care (J. Downar, Isenberg), Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.
Sarina R IsenbergBruyère Research Institute (Heidinger, A. Downar, J. Downar, Isenberg), Ottawa, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine (Frolic), McMaster University; Hamilton Health Sciences (Frolic), Hamilton, Ont.; Division of Palliative Care (J. Downar, Isenberg), Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont. sisenberg@bruyere.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs the COVID-19 pandemic created a surge in demand for critical care resources, the province of Ontario, Canada, released the Adult Critical Care Clinical Emergency Standard of Care for Major Surge (Emergency Standard of Care [ESoC]), a triage framework to guide the allocation of critical care resources in the expectation that intensive care units would be overwhelmed. Our aim was to understand physicians' and administrators' experiences and perceptions of planning to implement the ESoC, and to identify ways to improve critical care triage processes for future pandemics.

methodsWe conducted semistructured qualitative interviews with critical care, emergency and internal medicine physicians, and hospital administrators from various Ontario health regions who were involved in their hospital's or region's ESoC implementation planning. Interviews were conducted virtually between April and October 2021. We analyzed the data using thematic analysis.

resultsWe conducted interviews with 11 physicians and 10 hospital administrators representing 9 health regions. We identified 4 themes regarding participants' preparation to implement the ESoC: infrastructure to enable effective triage implementation; social, medical and political supports to enable effective triage implementation; moral dimensions of triage implementation; and communication of triage results. Participants outlined administrative and implementation-related improvements that could be provided at the provincial level, such as billing codes for ESoC. They also suggested improving ethical supports for the usability and quality of the ESoC (e.g., designating an ethicist in each region), and ways to improve the efficiency and usability of the tools for assessing short-term mortality risk (e.g., create information technology solutions such as a dashboard).

interpretationThe implementation of a jurisdiction-level triage framework poses moral challenges for a health care system, but it also requires dedicated infrastructure, as well as institutional supports. Lessons learned from Ontario's process to prepare for ESoC implementation, as well as participants' suggestions, can be used for planning for current and future pandemics.

Identifiers

PMID37726116
PMCPMC10516683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.