Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37725984›Full record

ArticleCell reports methods2023

Structure preserving adversarial generation of labeled training samples for single-cell segmentation.

Ervin Tasnadi, Alex Sliz-Nagy, Peter Horvath

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell reports methods, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ervin TasnadiSynthetic and Systems Biology Unit, Biological Research Centre, Eötvös Loránd Research Network, 6726 Szeged, Hungary; Doctoral School of Computer Science, University of Szeged, 6720 Szeged, Hungary; Single-Cell Technologies, Ltd, 6726 Szeged, Hungary. Electronic address: tasnadi.ervin@brc.hu.
Alex Sliz-NagySynthetic and Systems Biology Unit, Biological Research Centre, Eötvös Loránd Research Network, 6726 Szeged, Hungary.
Peter HorvathSynthetic and Systems Biology Unit, Biological Research Centre, Eötvös Loránd Research Network, 6726 Szeged, Hungary; Single-Cell Technologies, Ltd, 6726 Szeged, Hungary; Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland. Electronic address: horvath.peter@brc.hu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We introduce a generative data augmentation strategy to improve the accuracy of instance segmentation of microscopy data for complex tissue structures. Our pipeline uses regular and conditional generative adversarial networks (GANs) for image-to-image translation to construct synthetic microscopy images along with their corresponding masks to simulate the distribution and shape of the objects and their appearance. The synthetic samples are then used for training an instance segmentation network (for example, StarDist or Cellpose). We show on two single-cell-resolution tissue datasets that our method improves the accuracy of downstream instance segmentation tasks compared with traditional training strategies using either the raw data or basic augmentations. We also compare the quality of the object masks with those generated by a traditional cell population simulation method, finding that our synthesized masks are closer to the ground truth considering Fréchet inception distances.

Indexed as

MasksMicroscopyComputer SimulationCP: ImagingCP: Systems biologydata augmentationsingle-cell segmentation

Identifiers

PMID37725984
PMCPMC10545934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.