Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37725432›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2023

Using Social Media to Help Understand Patient-Reported Health Outcomes of Post-COVID-19 Condition: Natural Language Processing Approach.

Elham Dolatabadi, Diana Moyano, Michael Bales, Sofija Spasojevic, Rohan Bhambhoria, Junaid Bhatti, Shyamolima Debnath, Nicholas Hoell, Xin Li, Celine Leng and 11 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Portrait of mental health identified by people with the post-covid syndrome.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Elham DolatabadiFaculty of Health, School of Health Policy and Management, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2236-2611
Diana MoyanoVector Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0009-0007-9865-2232
Michael BalesHoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0009-0008-5604-2257
Sofija SpasojevicHoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8111-4197
Rohan BhambhoriaElectrical and Computer Engineering, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2597-670X
Junaid BhattiManulife, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9540-845X
Shyamolima DebnathDeloitte, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0009-0009-5062-5651
Nicholas HoellDeloitte, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0009-0008-1151-4716
Xin LiDepartment of Medicine and Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0009-0008-1831-7459
Celine LengHoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9153-2958
Sasha NandaDeloitte, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0009-0005-2182-1486
Jad SaabTELUS Health, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0009-0007-3667-7645
Esmat SahakDepartment of Medicine and Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0009-0008-3952-7068
Fanny SieHoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0009-0008-4944-2447
Sara UppalTELUS Health, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0009-0006-9008-005X
Nirma Khatri VadlamudiDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5513-7926
Antoaneta VladimirovaRoche Information Solutions, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID 0009-0000-5123-5158
Artur YakimovichHoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2458-4904
Xiaoxue YangDeloitte, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0009-0004-9059-9017
Sedef Akinli KocakVector Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0009-0009-6271-415X
Angela M CheungDepartment of Medicine and Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8332-0744

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile scientific knowledge of post-COVID-19 condition (PCC) is growing, there remains significant uncertainty in the definition of the disease, its expected clinical course, and its impact on daily functioning. Social media platforms can generate valuable insights into patient-reported health outcomes as the content is produced at high resolution by patients and caregivers, representing experiences that may be unavailable to most clinicians.

objectiveIn this study, we aimed to determine the validity and effectiveness of advanced natural language processing approaches built to derive insight into PCC-related patient-reported health outcomes from social media platforms Twitter and Reddit. We extracted PCC-related terms, including symptoms and conditions, and measured their occurrence frequency. We compared the outputs with human annotations and clinical outcomes and tracked symptom and condition term occurrences over time and locations to explore the pipeline's potential as a surveillance tool.

methodsWe used bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (BERT) models to extract and normalize PCC symptom and condition terms from English posts on Twitter and Reddit. We compared 2 named entity recognition models and implemented a 2-step normalization task to map extracted terms to unique concepts in standardized terminology. The normalization steps were done using a semantic search approach with BERT biencoders. We evaluated the effectiveness of BERT models in extracting the terms using a human-annotated corpus and a proximity-based score. We also compared the validity and reliability of the extracted and normalized terms to a web-based survey with more than 3000 participants from several countries.

resultsUmlsBERT-Clinical had the highest accuracy in predicting entities closest to those extracted by human annotators. Based on our findings, the top 3 most commonly occurring groups of PCC symptom and condition terms were systemic (such as fatigue), neuropsychiatric (such as anxiety and brain fog), and respiratory (such as shortness of breath). In addition, we also found novel symptom and condition terms that had not been categorized in previous studies, such as infection and pain. Regarding the co-occurring symptoms, the pair of fatigue and headaches was among the most co-occurring term pairs across both platforms. Based on the temporal analysis, the neuropsychiatric terms were the most prevalent, followed by the systemic category, on both social media platforms. Our spatial analysis concluded that 42% (10,938/26,247) of the analyzed terms included location information, with the majority coming from the United States, United Kingdom, and Canada.

conclusionsThe outcome of our social media-derived pipeline is comparable with the results of peer-reviewed articles relevant to PCC symptoms. Overall, this study provides unique insights into patient-reported health outcomes of PCC and valuable information about the patient's journey that can help health care providers anticipate future needs. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.1101/2022.12.14.22283419.

Indexed as

COVID-19Social MediaFatigueHumansNatural Language ProcessingPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresReproducibility of Resultsbidirectional encoder representations from transformersentity extractionentity normalizationhealth outcomelong COVIDmachine learningnatural language processingpatient-reported outcomepatient-reported symptomPCCpost–COVID-19 conditionPRORedditsocial mediasymptomtransformer modelsTwitter

Identifiers

PMID37725432
PMCPMC10510753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.