Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37725382›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2023

Causal Effects of Gut Microbiota on Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Mendelian Randomization Study.

Deshen Mao, Borui Tao, Shuyan Sheng, Hui Jin, Wenxuan Chen, Huimin Gao, Jianyi Deng, Zhuo Li, Fan Chen, Shixin Chan and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Potential protective role ofFrontiers in medicine · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Deshen MaoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Anqing Municipal Hospital, Anqing, China.
Borui TaoFirst Clinical Medical College, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Shuyan ShengFirst Clinical Medical College, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Hui JinDepartment of Medical Imaging, Anqing First People's Hospital, Anqing, China.
Wenxuan ChenSecond Clinical Medical College, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Huimin GaoDepartment of Pathology, Anqing Municipal Hospital, Anqing, China.
Jianyi DengFirst Clinical Medical College, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Zhuo LiSchool of Clinical Medicine, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Fan ChenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Anqing Municipal Hospital, Anqing, China.
Shixin ChanDepartment of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Longqi QianDepartment of Ophthalmology, Anqing Municipal Hospital, Anqing, China.
Anhui Medical University · CNAnqing City Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Recently, the association between gut microbiota and age-related macular degeneration (AMD) through the gut-retina axis has attracted great interest. However, the causal relationship between them has not been elucidated. Using publicly available genome-wide association study summary statistics, we conducted a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to examine the causal relationship between the gut microbiota and the occurrence of AMD. Methods: The study used a variety of quality control techniques to select instrumental single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with strong exposure associations. We used a set of SNPs as instrumental variable that were below the genome-wide statistical significance threshold (5 × 10-8). Additionally, a separate group of SNPs below the locus-wide significance level (1 × 10-5) were selected as instrumental variables to ensure a comprehensive conclusion. Inverse variance-weighted (IVW) analysis was the primary technique we used to examine causality in order to confirm the validity of our findings. The MR-Egger intercept test, Cochran's Q test, and leave-one-out sensitivity analysis were used to evaluate the horizontal pleiotropy, heterogeneities, and stability of the genetic variants. Results: IVW results showed that genus Anaerotruncus (P = 5.00 × 10-3), genus Candidatus Soleaferrea (P = 1.83 × 10-2), and genus unknown id.2071 (P = 3.12 × 10-2) were protective factors for AMD. The Eubacterium oxidoreducens group (P = 3.17 × 10-2), genus Faecalibacterium (P = 2.67 × 10-2), and genus Ruminococcaceae UCG-011 (P = 4.04 × 10-2) were risk factors of AMD. No gut microbiota (GM) taxa were found to be causally related to AMD at the phylum, class, order, and family levels (P > 0.05). The robustness of MR results were confirmed by heterogeneity and pleiotropy analysis. (P > 0.05). We also performed a bidirectional analysis, which showed that genus Anaerotruncus, genus Candidatus Soleaferrea, genus unknown id.2071 and the Eubacterium oxidoreducens group had an interaction with AMD, whereas genus Faecalibacterium showed only a unilateral unfavorable effect on AMD. Conclusions: We confirmed a causal relationship between AMD and GM taxa, including the Eubacterium oxidoreducens group, Faecalibacterium, Ruminococcaceae UCG-011, Anaerotruncus, and Candidatus Soleaferrea. These strains have the potential to serve as new biomarkers, offering valuable insights into the treatment and prevention of AMD.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeMacular DegenerationEubacterialesEubacteriumGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansMendelian Randomization Analysis

Identifiers

PMID37725382
PMCPMC10513115
OpenAlexW4386863723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.