Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37725249›Full record

ArticleAmbio2023

Leveraging research infrastructure co-location to evaluate constraints on terrestrial carbon cycling in northern European forests.

Martyn N Futter, Thomas Dirnböck, Martin Forsius, Jaana K Bäck, Nathalie Cools, Eugenio Diaz-Pines, Jan Dick, Veronika Gaube, Lauren M Gillespie, Lars Högbom and 10 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ambio, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Martyn N FutterInstitutionen för vatten och miljö, Lennart Hjelms Väg 9, Box 7050, 75007, Uppsala, Sweden. martyn.futter@slu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9789-7138
Thomas Dirnböck, Vienna, Austria.
Martin ForsiusFinnish Environment Institute, Latokartanonkaari 11, 00790, Helsinki, Finland.
Jaana K BäckUniversity of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Nathalie Cools, Geraardsbergen, Belgium.
Eugenio Diaz-PinesInstitute of Soil Research, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Peter-Jordan-Straße 82, 1190, Vienna, Austria.
Jan DickUniversity of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Veronika Gaube, Vienna, Austria.
Lauren M GillespieInstitute of Soil Research (IBF), Peter-Jordan-Straße 82, 1190, Vienna, Austria.
Lars HögbomSkogforsk, Uppsala Science Park, 751 83, Uppsala, Sweden.
Hjalmar LaudonDepartment of Forest Ecology and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 901 83, Umeå, Sweden.
Michael Mirtl, Vienna, Austria.
Nikolaos NikolaidisUniversity of Crete, Chania, Greece.
Christian Poppe TeránIBG-3, Wilhelm-Johnen-Straße, 52428, Jülich, Germany.
Ute SkibaUK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Bush Estate, Penicuik, EH26 0QB, UK.
Harry VereeckenAgropshere Institute (IBG-3), Forschungszentrum Jülich Gmbh, 52425, Jülich, Germany.
Holger VillwockInstitutionen för vatten och miljö, Lennart Hjelms Väg 9, Box 7050, 75007, Uppsala, Sweden.
James WeldonInstitutionen för vatten och miljö, Lennart Hjelms Väg 9, Box 7050, 75007, Uppsala, Sweden.
Christoph WohnerUmweltbundesamt GmbH, Spittelauer Lände 5, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Syed Ashraful AlamDepartment of Forest Sciences, University of Helsinki, Latokartanonkaari 7, 00014, Helsinki, Finland.

Funding

horizon europe 871128
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Integrated long-term, in-situ observations are needed to document ongoing environmental change, to "ground-truth" remote sensing and model outputs and to predict future Earth system behaviour. The scientific and societal value of in-situ observations increases with site representativeness, temporal duration, number of parameters measured and comparability within and across sites. Research Infrastructures (RIs) can support harmonised, cross-site data collection, curation and publication. Integrating RI networks through site co-location and standardised observation methods can help answers three questions about the terrestrial carbon sink: (i) What are present and future carbon sequestration rates in northern European forests? (ii) How are these rates controlled? (iii) Why do the observed patterns exist? Here, we present a conceptual model for RI co-location and highlight potential insights into the terrestrial carbon sink achievable when long-term in-situ Earth observation sites participate in multiple RI networks (e.g., ICOS and eLTER). Finally, we offer recommendations to promote RI co-location.

Indexed as

Carbon CycleCarbon SequestrationEnvironmental MonitoringForestsEuropeCarbon: co-locationeLTERForestResearch infrastructure

Identifiers

PMID37725249
PMCPMC10562320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.