ArticleMolecular neurobiology2024
Transcriptomic Analysis of the Rat Dorsal Root Ganglion After Fracture.
Article in Molecular neurobiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multifunctional scaffold inspired by hepatocyte exosomes promotes bone regeneration by regulating osteogenic differentiation via PI3K/AKT pathway.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Talin1 loss activates DRG neurons to accelerate bone remodeling and fracture healing in mice.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2026Article
- Temporal transcriptomic dynamics in rat spinal cord after tibial fracture unveil crosstalk between spinal cord and bone.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In fractures, pain signals are transmitted from the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) to the brain, and the DRG generates efferent signals to the injured bone to participate in the injury response. However, little is known about how this process occurs. We analyzed DRG transcriptome at 3, 7, 14, and 28 days after fracture. We identified the key pathways through KEGG and GO enrichment analysis. We then used IPA analysis to obtain upstream regulators and disease pathways. Finally, we compared the sequencing results with those of nerve injury to identify the unique transcriptome changes in DRG after fracture. We found that the first 14 days after fracture were the main repair response period, the 3rd day was the peak of repair activity, the 14th day was dominated by the stimulus response, and on the 28th day, the repair response had reached a plateau. ECM-receptor interaction, protein digestion and absorption, and the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway were most significantly enriched, which may be involved in repair regeneration, injury response, and pain transmission. Compared with the nerve injury model, DRG after fracture produced specific alterations related to bone repair, and the bone density function was the most widely activated bone-related function. Our results obtained some important genes and pathways in DRG after fracture, and we also summarized the main features of transcriptome function at each time point through functional annotation clustering of GO pathway, which gave us a deeper understanding of the role played by DRG in fracture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37725213What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.