Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37725213›Full record

ArticleMolecular neurobiology2024

Transcriptomic Analysis of the Rat Dorsal Root Ganglion After Fracture.

Xinyi Gu, Chen Huang, Shen Wang, Jin Deng, Shuhang Guo, Aihaiti Sulitan, Wanjun Gu, Qingguo Lu, Shaoxun Yuan, Xiaofeng Yin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular neurobiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Xinyi GuDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Peking University People's Hospital, No. 11 Xizhimen South Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100044, China.
Chen HuangDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Peking University People's Hospital, No. 11 Xizhimen South Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100044, China.
Shen WangDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Peking University People's Hospital, No. 11 Xizhimen South Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100044, China.
Jin DengDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Peking University People's Hospital, No. 11 Xizhimen South Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100044, China.
Shuhang GuoDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Peking University People's Hospital, No. 11 Xizhimen South Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100044, China.
Aihaiti SulitanSchool of Artificial Intelligence and Information Technology, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, No. 138 Xianlin Avenue, Qixia District, Nanjing, 210023, China.
Wanjun GuSchool of Artificial Intelligence and Information Technology, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, No. 138 Xianlin Avenue, Qixia District, Nanjing, 210023, China.
Qingguo LuTrauma Center, Pizhou People's Hospital, Xuzhou, Jiangsu Province, 221300, China.
Shaoxun YuanSchool of Artificial Intelligence and Information Technology, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, No. 138 Xianlin Avenue, Qixia District, Nanjing, 210023, China. ysx0226@gmail.com.
Xiaofeng YinDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Peking University People's Hospital, No. 11 Xizhimen South Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100044, China. xiaofengyin@bjmu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9932-642X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In fractures, pain signals are transmitted from the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) to the brain, and the DRG generates efferent signals to the injured bone to participate in the injury response. However, little is known about how this process occurs. We analyzed DRG transcriptome at 3, 7, 14, and 28 days after fracture. We identified the key pathways through KEGG and GO enrichment analysis. We then used IPA analysis to obtain upstream regulators and disease pathways. Finally, we compared the sequencing results with those of nerve injury to identify the unique transcriptome changes in DRG after fracture. We found that the first 14 days after fracture were the main repair response period, the 3rd day was the peak of repair activity, the 14th day was dominated by the stimulus response, and on the 28th day, the repair response had reached a plateau. ECM-receptor interaction, protein digestion and absorption, and the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway were most significantly enriched, which may be involved in repair regeneration, injury response, and pain transmission. Compared with the nerve injury model, DRG after fracture produced specific alterations related to bone repair, and the bone density function was the most widely activated bone-related function. Our results obtained some important genes and pathways in DRG after fracture, and we also summarized the main features of transcriptome function at each time point through functional annotation clustering of GO pathway, which gave us a deeper understanding of the role played by DRG in fracture.

Indexed as

Ganglia, SpinalPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesAnimalsGene Expression ProfilingPainRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesDRGFractureGOIPAKEGGTranscriptome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.