ArticlePediatric cardiology2024
Augmented Reality Visualization of 3D Rotational Angiography in Congenital Heart Disease: A Comparative Study to Standard Computer Visualization.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Computer-Based Simulation Technologies in Pediatric Cardiovascular Diseases: A Systematic Review of Applications and Outcomes.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Technical Feasibility of Virtual Reality-Enhanced Three-Dimensional Rotational Angiography: A Retrospective Analysis of a Novel Imaging Approach for Interventional Procedures in the Pediatric Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Article
- Transforming Care in Congenital Heart Disease: The Role of Extended Reality in Family and Trainee Education and Procedural Planning.Current cardiology reports · 2025Review
- Review
- Application of Mixed/Augmented Reality in Interventional Cardiology.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Augmented reality (AR) visualization of 3D rotational angiography (3DRA) provides 3D representations of cardiac structures with full visualization of the procedural environment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of converting 3DRAs of congenital heart disease patients to AR models, highlight the workflow for 3DRA optimization for AR visualization, and assess physicians' perceptions of their use. This single-center study prospectively evaluated 30 retrospectively-acquired 3DRAs that were converted to AR, compared to Computer Models (CM). Median patient age 6.5 years (0.24-38.8) and weight 20.6 kg (3.4-107.0). AR and CM quality were graded highly. RV pacing was associated with higher quality of both model types (p = 0.02). Visualization and identification of structures were graded as "very easy" in 81.1% (n = 73) and 67.8% (n = 61) of AR and CM, respectively. Fifty-nine (66%) grades 'Agreed' or 'Strongly Agreed' that AR models provided superior appreciation of 3D relationships; AR was found to be least beneficial in visualization of aortic arch obstruction. AR models were thought to be helpful in identifying pathology and assisting in interventional planning in 85 assessments (94.4%). There was significant potential seen in the opportunity for patient/family counseling and trainee/staff education with AR models. It is feasible to convert 3D models of 3DRAs into AR models, which are of similar image quality as compared to CM. AR models provided additional benefits to visualization of 3D relationships in most anatomies. Future directions include integration of interventional simulation, peri-procedural counseling of patients and families, and education of trainees and staff with AR models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37725124What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.