Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37724756›Full record

ArticleDiagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey)2024

Long-term follow-up results of multiparametric prostate MRI and the prognostic value of PI-RADS: a single-center retrospective cohort study

Ömer Önder, Müjdat Ayva, Yasin Yaraşır, Volkan Gürler, Mustafa Sertaç Yazıcı, Bülent Akdoğan, Ali Devrim Karaosmanoğlu, Muşturay Karçaaltıncaba, Mustafa Nasuh Özmen, Deniz Akata

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The evolving PI-RADS paradigm.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ömer ÖnderHacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Ankara, TürkiyeORCID 0000-0001-8701-5974
Müjdat AyvaHacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Urology, Ankara, TürkiyeORCID 0000-0003-0462-8498
Yasin YaraşırHacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Ankara, TürkiyeORCID 0000-0001-5124-9584
Volkan GürlerHacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Ankara, TürkiyeORCID 0000-0001-9315-7055
Mustafa Sertaç YazıcıHacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Urology, Ankara, TürkiyeORCID 0000-0001-9616-3776
Bülent AkdoğanHacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Urology, Ankara, TürkiyeORCID 0000-0002-6396-1912
Ali Devrim KaraosmanoğluHacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Ankara, TürkiyeORCID 0000-0003-0027-9593
Muşturay KarçaaltıncabaHacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Ankara, TürkiyeORCID 0000-0002-3384-0909
Mustafa Nasuh ÖzmenHacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Ankara, TürkiyeORCID 0000-0002-9910-4808
Deniz AkataHacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Ankara, TürkiyeORCID 0000-0002-1318-0085

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe aim to examine the long-term outcomes of patients who underwent multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) for suspected prostate cancer (PCa), specifically based on their initial Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) categories and various clinical factors. Our secondary aim is to evaluate the prognostic value of the PI-RADS through the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk group distribution.

methodsThis research was conducted as a single-center retrospective cohort study in a tertiary care hospital. A total of 1,359 cases having at least one histopathological examination after the initial mp-MRI and/or adequate clinical/radiological follow-up data were included in the clinically significant PCa (cs-PCa) diagnosis-free survival analysis. Initial mp-MRI dates were accepted as the start of follow-up for the time-to-event analysis. The event was defined as cs-PCa diagnosis (International Society of Urological Pathology ≥2). Patients who were not diagnosed with cs-PCa during follow-up were censored according to predefined literature-based criteria at the end of the maximum follow-up duration with no reasonable suspicion of PCa and no biopsy indication. The impact of various factors on survival was assessed using a log-rank test and multivariable Cox regression. Subsequently, 394 cases diagnosed with PCa during follow-up were evaluated, based on initial PI-RADS categories and NCCN risk groups.

resultsThree main risk factors for cs-PCa diagnosis during follow-up were an initial PI-RADS 5 category, initial PI-RADS 4 category, and high MRI-defined PSA density (mPSAD), with average hazard ratios of 29.52, 14.46, and 3.12, respectively. The PI-RADS 3 category, advanced age group, and biopsy-naïve status were identified as additional risk factors (hazard ratios: 2.03, 1.54-1.98, and 1.79, respectively). In the PI-RADS 1-2 cohort, 1, 3, and 5-year cs-PCa diagnosis-free survival rates were 99.1%, 96.5%, and 93.8%, respectively. For the PI-RADS 3 cohort, 1, 3, and 5-year cs-PCa diagnosis-free survival rates were 94.9%, 90.9%, and 89.1%, respectively. For the PI-RADS 4 cohort, 1, 3, and 5-year cs-PCa diagnosis-free survival rates were 56.6%, 55.1%, and 55.1%, respectively. These rates were found to all be 24.2% in the PI-RADS 5 cohort. Considering the 394 cases diagnosed with PCa during follow-up, PI-RADS ≥4 cases were more likely to harbor unfavorable PCa compared to PI-RADS ≤3 cases (

conclusionThe PI-RADS category has a significant impact on patient management and provides important diagnostic and prognostic information. Higher initial PI-RADS categories are associated with decreased follow-up losses, a shorter time to PCa diagnosis, increased biopsy rates, a higher likelihood of developing cs-PCa during follow-up, and a worse PCa prognosis. Combining mPSAD with PI-RADS categories could enhance diagnostic stratification in the identification of cs-PCa.

Indexed as

Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance ImagingProstatic NeoplasmsAgedCohort StudiesFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProstateRetrospective Studiesbiopsydiagnosisfollow-up studiesmultiparametric magnetic resonance imagingprognosisProstatic neoplasm

Identifiers

PMID37724756
PMCPMC11095067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.