Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37724741›Full record

ArticleGenetics2023

Scaling the discrete-time Wright-Fisher model to biobank-scale datasets.

Jeffrey P Spence, Tony Zeng, Hakhamanesh Mostafavi, Jonathan K Pritchard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jeffrey P SpenceDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Tony ZengDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Hakhamanesh MostafaviDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Jonathan K PritchardDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.

Funding

Integration of genetic association mapping and functional data to elucidate genetic mechanisms of diseaseR01HG008140 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI JONATHAN K PRITCHARD · 2016 to 2026
$7.3M
New methods for constructing and evaluating polygenic scoresR01HG011432 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PRITCHARD, JONATHAN K · 2020 to 2023
$3.3M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG008140NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG011432
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The discrete-time Wright-Fisher (DTWF) model and its diffusion limit are central to population genetics. These models can describe the forward-in-time evolution of allele frequencies in a population resulting from genetic drift, mutation, and selection. Computing likelihoods under the diffusion process is feasible, but the diffusion approximation breaks down for large samples or in the presence of strong selection. Existing methods for computing likelihoods under the DTWF model do not scale to current exome sequencing sample sizes in the hundreds of thousands. Here, we present a scalable algorithm that approximates the DTWF model with provably bounded error. Our approach relies on two key observations about the DTWF model. The first is that transition probabilities under the model are approximately sparse. The second is that transition distributions for similar starting allele frequencies are extremely close as distributions. Together, these observations enable approximate matrix-vector multiplication in linear (as opposed to the usual quadratic) time. We prove similar properties for Hypergeometric distributions, enabling fast computation of likelihoods for subsamples of the population. We show theoretically and in practice that this approximation is highly accurate and can scale to population sizes in the tens of millions, paving the way for rigorous biobank-scale inference. Finally, we use our results to estimate the impact of larger samples on estimating selection coefficients for loss-of-function variants. We find that increasing sample sizes beyond existing large exome sequencing cohorts will provide essentially no additional information except for genes with the most extreme fitness effects.

Indexed as

Biological Specimen BanksGenetics, PopulationGene FrequencyGenetic DriftModels, GeneticProbabilitySelection, Geneticloss-of-functionselectionWright–Fisher

Identifiers

PMID37724741
PMCPMC10627256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.