Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37724711›Full record

ReviewBritish medical bulletin2023

Interventions to tackle health inequalities in cardiovascular risks for socioeconomically disadvantaged populations: a rapid review.

Yu Fu, Ge Yu, Naswa Maulana, Katie Thomson

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British medical bulletin, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Yu FuDepartment of Primary Care & Mental Health, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, 1-3 Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GL, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4972-0626
Ge YuKing's Health Economics, Health Services and Population Research, Department of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, David Goldberg Centre 18 De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK.
Naswa MaulanaPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences Newcastle University, Baddiley-Clark Building, Richardson Road, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4AX, UK.
Katie ThomsonPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences Newcastle University, Baddiley-Clark Building, Richardson Road, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4AX, UK.
Cumbria Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust · GBKing's College London · GBNewcastle University · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) [Applied Research Collaboration North East and North Cumbria NIHR200173
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCardiovascular disease (CVD) has shown significant health inequalities for people with low socioeconomic status associated with more risk factors. This review was to synthesize interventions that targeted CVD risks and outcomes among socioeconomically disadvantaged populations and to understand the impact associated with these interventions. SOURCES OF DATA: Cochrane CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and CINAHL were searched for records published in the last decade using a systematic search strategy, complemented by screening the reference lists and citation indexes. Nineteen studies were included and a narrative synthesis with the effect direction plot was undertaken in which studies, interventions, participants and outcomes were examined according to the intervention type focusing on behaviours, lifestyle, education, medication and monitoring. AREAS OF AGREEMENT: No universal definition of disadvantaged socioeconomic status was used with common factors relating to racial/ethnic minorities, low income and low or no health insurance. Mixed effects of interventions were reported on clinical outcomes including weight, body mass index, blood pressure, glycated haemoglobin and cholesterol. AREAS OF CONTROVERSY: Inconsistent effect was reported due to a large variety of settings, participants and intervention components although they are considered necessary to address the complex health needs of socioeconomically disadvantaged populations. GROWING POINTS: There is inadequate evidence to determine whether any of the intervention types are effective in optimising lipids management for socioeconomically disadvantaged populations. AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH: Research is needed with mixed evidence using real world evaluation and lived experience combined with health economic evaluation, on both mental and physical health outcomes.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesHealth InequitiesHeart Disease Risk FactorsHumansRisk Factorscardiovascular diseasehealth inequalitieslipid managementrapid reviewsocioeconomically disadvantaged

Identifiers

PMID37724711
PMCPMC10724464
OpenAlexW4386864504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.