Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37724664›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2023

Wettability and morphology of proboscises interweave with hawkmoth evolutionary history.

Alexandre V Palaoro, Akshata R Gole, Yueming Sun, Adam Puchalski, Charles E Beard, Peter H Adler, Konstantin G Kornev

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alexandre V PalaoroDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8629-0728
Akshata R GoleDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA.
Yueming SunDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4448-4046
Adam PuchalskiDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA.
Charles E BeardDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA.
Peter H AdlerDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA.
Konstantin G KornevDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4513-1915

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hovering hawkmoths expend significant energy while feeding, which should select for greater feeding efficiency. Although increased feeding efficiency has been implicitly assumed, it has never been assessed. We hypothesized that hawkmoths have proboscises specialized for gathering nectar passively. Using contact angle and capillary pressure to evaluate capillary action of the proboscis, we conducted a comparative analysis of wetting and absorption properties for 13 species of hawkmoths. We showed that all 13 species have a hydrophilic proboscis. In contradistinction, the proboscises of all other tested lepidopteran species have a wetting dichotomy with only the distal ∼10% hydrophilic. Longer proboscises are more wettable, suggesting that species of hawkmoths with long proboscises are more efficient at acquiring nectar by the proboscis surface than are species with shorter proboscises. All hawkmoth species also show strong capillary pressure, which, together with the feeding behaviors we observed, ensures that nectar will be delivered to the food canal efficiently. The patterns we found suggest that different subfamilies of hawkmoths use different feeding strategies. Our comparative approach reveals that hawkmoths are unique among Lepidoptera and highlights the importance of considering the physical characteristics of the proboscis to understand the evolution and diversification of hawkmoths.

Indexed as

ButterfliesManducaAnimalsFeeding BehaviorPlant NectarWettabilityPlant NectarContact angleFluid dynamicsLepidopteraMenisciSphingidae

Identifiers

PMID37724664
PMCPMC10617603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.