Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37724556›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2023

Healthcare professionals' attitudes to mandatory COVID-19 vaccination: Cross-sectional survey data from four European countries.

Linda C Karlsson, Amanda Garrison, Dawn Holford, Angelo Fasce, Stephan Lewandowsky, Frederike Taubert, Philipp Schmid, Cornelia Betsch, Fernanda Rodrigues, Lisa Fressard and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Profiling vaccine hesitancy in nursing to tailor public healthcare policies: A cross-sectional international study.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 8 countries.

Linda C KarlssonDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-2883-9153
Amanda GarrisonFaculté des Sciences Médicales et Paramédicales, Southeastern Health Regional Observatory (Observatoire Régional de la Santé, ORS-PACA), Marseille, France.
Dawn HolfordSchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Angelo FasceFaculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Stephan LewandowskySchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Frederike TaubertInstitute for Planetary Health Behavior, Health Communication, University of Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany.
Philipp SchmidInstitute for Planetary Health Behavior, Health Communication, University of Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany.
Cornelia BetschInstitute for Planetary Health Behavior, Health Communication, University of Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany.
Fernanda RodriguesFaculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Lisa FressardFaculté des Sciences Médicales et Paramédicales, Southeastern Health Regional Observatory (Observatoire Régional de la Santé, ORS-PACA), Marseille, France.
Pierre VergerFaculté des Sciences Médicales et Paramédicales, Southeastern Health Regional Observatory (Observatoire Régional de la Santé, ORS-PACA), Marseille, France.
Anna SoveriDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Southeastern Health · USUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversity of Coimbra · PTUniversity of Turku · FIRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity of Bristol · GBUniversity of Potsdam · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mandatory vaccinations are widely debated since they restrict individuals' autonomy in their health decisions. As healthcare professionals (HCPs) are a common target group of vaccine mandates, and also form a link between vaccination policies and the public, understanding their attitudes toward vaccine mandates is important. The present study investigated physicians' attitudes to COVID-19 vaccine mandates in four European countries: Finland, France, Germany, and Portugal. An electronic survey assessing attitudes to COVID-19 vaccine mandates and general vaccination attitudes (e.g. perceived vaccine safety, trust in health authorities, and openness to patients) was sent to physicians in the spring of 2022. A total of 2796 physicians responded. Across all countries, 78% of the physicians were in favor of COVID-19 vaccine mandates for HCPs, 49% favored COVID-19 vaccine mandates for the public, and 67% endorsed COVID-19 health passes. Notable differences were observed between countries, with attitudes to mandates found to be more positive in countries where the mandate, or similar mandates, were in effect. The associations between attitudes to mandates and general vaccination attitudes were mostly small to neglectable and differed between countries. Nevertheless, physicians with more positive mandate attitudes perceived vaccines as more beneficial (in Finland and France) and had greater trust in medical authorities (in France and Germany). The present study contributes to the body of research within social and behavioral sciences that support evidence-based vaccination policymaking.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesAttitude of Health PersonnelCross-Sectional StudiesHumansVaccinationCOVID-19 Vaccinesattitudescompulsory vaccinationCOVID-19EuropeHCPshealthcare professionalsmandatesreactanceVaccines

Identifiers

PMID37724556
PMCPMC10512846
OpenAlexW4386846432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.