ArticleEpilepsia open2024
Electroencephalography-functional magnetic resonance imaging for clinical evaluation in focal epilepsy.
Article in Epilepsia open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrating multivariate resting-state fMRI features to localize epileptic networks in common childhood epilepsy.Epilepsia · 2026Article
- Multimodal quantitative analysis guides precise preoperative localization of epilepsy.Journal of neurology · 2025Review
- Electroencephalography-functional magnetic resonance imaging for clinical evaluation in focal epilepsy.Epilepsia open · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveWe aimed to evaluate the contribution of simultaneous recording of electroencephalography-functional magnetic resonance imaging (EEG-fMRI) in the diagnosis of epilepsy syndrome, localization of the epileptogenic zone (EZ), and decision-making regarding surgical treatment.
methodsWe performed a retrospective study to evaluate patients with focal epilepsy who underwent EEG-fMRI. Two evaluators assessed epilepsy syndrome, presumed focus, and surgical candidacy and defined confidence levels. They assessed these clinical characteristics first without EEG-fMRI and then including EEG-fMRI to assess how the results of EEG-fMRI changed the evaluations. We also determined how the clinical evaluation was affected by the concordance level between the blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) response and the presumed focus location, and by the confidence level of the BOLD response itself based on the t-value of the primary and secondary clusters.
resultsFifty-one scans from 48 patients were included. The BOLD map affected 66.7% of the evaluations by altering evaluation items (epilepsy syndrome, presumed focus, or surgical candidacy) or their confidence levels. EEG-fMRI results increased the confidence levels of epilepsy syndrome, presumed focus, or surgical candidacy in 47.1% of patients but reduced clinical confidence in these features in 11.8%. More specifically, the confidence levels increased for epilepsy syndrome in 28.5%, identification of presumed focus in 33.9%, and determination of surgical candidacy in 29.4%. The BOLD signal confidence level, whether high or low, did not influence these clinical factors. SIGNIFICANCE: Previous studies have emphasized the utility of EEG-fMRI for the localization of the epileptogenic zone. This study demonstrated the potential of EEG-fMRI to influence clinical confidence when determining epilepsy syndrome, the presumed epileptic focus, and surgical candidacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.