ArticleMedical review (2021)2023
"One-for-All" approach: a black technology for nanomedicine development?
Article in Medical review (2021), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Precision phototherapy and imaging with aggregation-induced emission-based nanoparticles cloaked in macrophage membrane.Medical review (2021) · 2025Article
- Targeted drug delivery in neurodegenerative diseases: the role of nanotechnology.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer nanomedicines require different, even opposite, properties to voyage the cascade drug delivery process involving a series of biological barriers. Currently-approved nanomedicines can only alleviate adverse effects but cannot improve patient survival because they fail to meet all the requirements. Therefore, nanocarriers with synchronized functions are highly requisite to capacitate efficient drug delivery and enhanced therapeutic efficacies. This perspective article summarizes recent advances in the two main strategies for nanomedicine design, the All-in-One approach (integration of all the functions in one system) and the One-for-All approach (one functional group with proper affinity enables all the functions), and presents our views on future nanomedicine development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.