ArticleMedical review (2021)2021
Resident stem cells in the heart.
Article in Medical review (2021), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent Insights into Endogenous Mammalian Cardiac Regeneration Post-Myocardial Infarction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Stem cell antigen-1Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2023Article
- Cell-cell crosstalk in the heart.Medical review (2021) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of mobility and morality worldwide, in which the ischemic heart disease is the most common type of the diseases. During last decade, a major progress in the study of the pathogenesis of heart disease has been achieved. For example, the discovery of adult stem/progenitor cells in the heart and vessel tissues may play a role in tissue regeneration. However, the issue of 31 retractions for cardiac stem cell work has caused a "storm of trust" in the heart stem cell field, in which both founders and scientists have become cautious and conservative in stem cell research of the heart. Despite that the existence of adult cardiac stem cells has been denied, recent studies confirmed that there are many other resident stem/progenitor cells in adult heart. Although these cells cannot differentiate into cardiomyocytes, the role they played in heart repair after injury should not be ignored. The purpose of this short article is to briefly review the current research progress in resident stem/progenitor cells in the heart, to discuss how they function during cardiac repair and to point out unanswered questions in the research field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.