Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37724055›Full record

ArticleObesity (Silver Spring, Md.)2023

Associations and predictive performance of 11 anthropometric measures with incident type 2 diabetes: A prospective cohort study from the UK Biobank.

Jirapitcha Boonpor, Solange Parra-Soto, Atefeh Talebi, Ziyi Zhou, Fernanda Carrasco-Marin, Fanny Petermann-Rocha, Paul Welsh, Jill P Pell, Naveed Sattar, Jason M R Gill and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Jirapitcha BoonporSchool of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Solange Parra-SotoSchool of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Atefeh TalebiSchool of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Ziyi ZhouSchool of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Fernanda Carrasco-MarinSchool of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Fanny Petermann-RochaSchool of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Paul WelshSchool of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Jill P PellSchool of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Naveed SattarSchool of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Jason M R GillSchool of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Stuart R GraySchool of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8969-9636
Carlos Celis-MoralesSchool of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Frederick K HoSchool of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7190-9025
University of Glasgow · GBCatholic University of the Maule · CLKasetsart University · THUniversity of Bío-Bío · CLUniversity of Concepción · CL

Funding

British Heart FoundationDepartment of HealthMedical Research CouncilWellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe study aim was to investigate associations of 11 anthropometric measures with incident type 2 diabetes and compare their predictive performance.

methodsThis prospective cohort study included 161,127 White European UK Biobank participants who were free of diabetes at baseline. Anthropometric measures included height, weight, BMI, A Body Shape Index, waist circumference, waist to hip ratio, waist to height ratio (WHtR), hip circumference, visceral adiposity index, hip index, and anthropometric risk index. The associations were examined using Cox proportional hazard models. The differences in C-index were used to compare predictive performance between BMI and other anthropometric measures.

resultsThe median follow-up was 10.0 (interquartile range: 9.3-10.8) years, during which 6315 participants developed type 2 diabetes. All markers except height and hip index were positively associated with incident type 2 diabetes. The strongest associations were found for WHtR (hazard ratio per 1-SD increment: 2.27 [95% CI 2.19-2.35] in women; 1.96 [95% CI 1.90-2.01] in men). Compared with BMI, WHtR and anthropometric risk index had significantly better type 2 diabetes risk discrimination.

conclusionsAlthough most adiposity markers were associated with type 2 diabetes, the magnitude of the associations differed. WHtR had the strongest associations and predictive ability for type 2 diabetes and thus could be a more suitable marker for clinical use.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2AdiposityBiological Specimen BanksFemaleHumansMaleProspective StudiesUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID37724055
PMCPMC10947384
OpenAlexW4386843717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.