Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37723940›Full record

ArticleClinical endocrinology2023

Correspondence on "Sex steroid priming for growth hormone stimulation testing in children and adolescents with short stature: A systematic review".

Mabel Yau, Robert Rapaport

Abstract readLetterComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical endocrinology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 76% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mabel YauDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Mount Sinai Kravis Children's Hospital, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6192-224X
Robert RapaportDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Mount Sinai Kravis Children's Hospital, New York, New York, USA.
Mount Sinai Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Duncan et al. reviewed the response to growth hormone stimulation testing after priming in peripubertal children. The concern is that there is little research documenting the response to growth hormone treatment in patients with sex hormone primed growth hormone stimulation testing and those unprimed. The controversy about priming or not can be summarized as follows: if one wants to know if the production of growth hormone during puberty will be adequate in terms of peak growth hormone responses then stimulation with priming should be done.

Indexed as

Growth HormoneHuman Growth HormoneAdolescentBody HeightChildGonadal Steroid HormonesGrowth DisordersHumansPubertySteroidsSystematic Reviews as TopicGonadal Steroid HormonesGrowth HormoneHuman Growth HormoneSteroidsgrowth hormoneprovocative testingpubertysex steroid

Identifiers

PMID37723940
OpenAlexW4386843401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.