ArticleCancer medicine2023
Discrimination of ground-glass nodular lung adenocarcinoma pathological subtypes via transfer learning: A multicenter study.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparative diagnostic accuracy of radiomics, deep learning, and hybrid AI for invasiveness stratification of pulmonary ground-glass nodules: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Evaluation of locoregional invasiveness of early lung adenocarcinoma manifesting as ground-glass nodules via [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Trial
- Development and internal validation of a high-resolution computed tomography radiomics and three-dimensional deep learning diagnostic prediction model for preoperative differentiation of minimally invasive and invasive adenocarcinoma in subsolid nodules.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- A CT-based multi-scale fusion model with SHAP interpretation for preoperative differentiation between lung adenocarcinoma in situ/minimally invasive adenocarcinoma and invasive adenocarcinoma: a multicenter study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Deep learning and radiomics fusion for predicting the invasiveness of lung adenocarcinoma within ground glass nodules.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Diagnostic accuracy of deep learning for the invasiveness assessment of ground-glass nodules with fine segmentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Impact of histopathological subtypes on invasive lung adenocarcinoma: from epidemiology to tumour microenvironment to therapeutic strategies.World journal of surgical oncology · 2025Review
- Differentiation of early-stage tumors from benign lesions manifesting as pure ground-glass nodule: a clinical prediction study based on AI-derived quantitative parameters.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Discrimination of ground-glass nodular lung adenocarcinoma pathological subtypes via transfer learning: A multicenter study.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe surgical approach and prognosis for invasive adenocarcinoma (IAC) and minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA) of the lung differ. However, they both manifest as identical ground-glass nodules (GGNs) in computed tomography images, and no effective method exists to discriminate them.
methodsWe developed and validated a three-dimensional (3D) deep transfer learning model to discriminate IAC from MIA based on CT images of GGNs. This model uses a 3D medical image pre-training model (MedicalNet) and a fusion model to build a classification network. Transfer learning was utilized for end-to-end predictive modeling of the cohort data of the first center, and the cohort data of the other two centers were used as independent external validation data. This study included 999 lung GGN images of 921 patients pathologically diagnosed with IAC or MIA at three cohort centers.
resultsThe predictive performance of the model was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The model had high diagnostic efficacy for the training and validation groups (accuracy: 89%, sensitivity: 95%, specificity: 84%, and AUC: 95% in the training group; accuracy: 88%, sensitivity: 84%, specificity: 93%, and AUC: 92% in the internal validation group; accuracy: 83%, sensitivity: 83%, specificity: 83%, and AUC: 89% in one external validation group; accuracy: 78%, sensitivity: 80%, specificity: 77%, and AUC: 82% in the other external validation group).
conclusionsOur 3D deep transfer learning model provides a noninvasive, low-cost, rapid, and reproducible method for preoperative prediction of IAC and MIA in lung cancer patients with GGNs. It can help clinicians to choose the optimal surgical strategy and improve the prognosis of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.