Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37723872›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2023

Discrimination of ground-glass nodular lung adenocarcinoma pathological subtypes via transfer learning: A multicenter study.

Chun-Long Fu, Ze-Bin Yang, Ping Li, Kang-Fei Shan, Mei-Kang Wu, Jie-Ping Xu, Chi-Jun Ma, Fang-Hong Luo, Long Zhou, Ji-Hong Sun and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Chun-Long FuDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Dongyang Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Dongyang, China.
Ze-Bin YangDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Dongyang Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Dongyang, China.
Ping LiDepartment of Radiology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Kang-Fei ShanDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Dongyang Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Dongyang, China.
Mei-Kang WuDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Dongyang Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Dongyang, China.
Jie-Ping XuDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Dongyang Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Dongyang, China.
Chi-Jun MaDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Dongyang Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Dongyang, China.
Fang-Hong LuoDepartment of Radiology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Long ZhouDepartment of Radiology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Ji-Hong SunDepartment of Radiology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Fen-Hua ZhaoDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Dongyang Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Dongyang, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3940-2934

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe surgical approach and prognosis for invasive adenocarcinoma (IAC) and minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA) of the lung differ. However, they both manifest as identical ground-glass nodules (GGNs) in computed tomography images, and no effective method exists to discriminate them.

methodsWe developed and validated a three-dimensional (3D) deep transfer learning model to discriminate IAC from MIA based on CT images of GGNs. This model uses a 3D medical image pre-training model (MedicalNet) and a fusion model to build a classification network. Transfer learning was utilized for end-to-end predictive modeling of the cohort data of the first center, and the cohort data of the other two centers were used as independent external validation data. This study included 999 lung GGN images of 921 patients pathologically diagnosed with IAC or MIA at three cohort centers.

resultsThe predictive performance of the model was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The model had high diagnostic efficacy for the training and validation groups (accuracy: 89%, sensitivity: 95%, specificity: 84%, and AUC: 95% in the training group; accuracy: 88%, sensitivity: 84%, specificity: 93%, and AUC: 92% in the internal validation group; accuracy: 83%, sensitivity: 83%, specificity: 83%, and AUC: 89% in one external validation group; accuracy: 78%, sensitivity: 80%, specificity: 77%, and AUC: 82% in the other external validation group).

conclusionsOur 3D deep transfer learning model provides a noninvasive, low-cost, rapid, and reproducible method for preoperative prediction of IAC and MIA in lung cancer patients with GGNs. It can help clinicians to choose the optimal surgical strategy and improve the prognosis of patients.

Indexed as

Adenocarcinoma of LungDeep LearningLung NeoplasmsAgedFemaleHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisROC CurveTomography, X-Ray Computedadenocarcinomadeep learninglungprognosisX-ray computed tomography

Identifiers

PMID37723872
PMCPMC10557850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.