Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37723580›Full record

ArticleImplementation science communications2023

Who's "in the room where it happens"? A taxonomy and five-step methodology for identifying and characterizing policy actors.

Gracelyn Cruden, Erika L Crable, Rebecca Lengnick-Hall, Jonathan Purtle

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Gracelyn CrudenChestnut Health System, Lighthouse Institute-Oregon Group, Eugene, OR, 97401, USA. gcruden@chestnut.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1737-5867
Erika L CrableDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Rebecca Lengnick-HallBrown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Jonathan PurtleSchool of Global Public Health, New York University, New York City, NY, USA.
Chestnut Health Systems · USNew York University · USUniversity of California San Diego · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

National Survey of State Policy Decision-making and SimulationP50MH113662 · NIMH · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI HOAGWOOD, KIMBERLY E. · 2019 to 2022
$6.9M
IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES IRI-MHSR25MH080916 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Byron James Powell · 2009 to 2026
$3.7M
The Lifespan/Brown Criminal Justice Research Program on Substance Use and HIVR25DA037190 · NIDA · MIRIAM HOSPITAL · PI CURT G BECKWITH · 2014 to 2026
$3.5M
Implementation of the Federal 988 Suicide and Mental Health Crisis Hotline Policy: Determinants and Effects of State Policy Implementation Financing StrategiesR01MH131649 · NIMH · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI Jonathan Purtle · 2023 to 2026
$1.6M
Policy Dissemination Strategies to Improve the Use of Research Evidence in Medicaid Benefits for Opioid Use Disorder TreatmentK01DA056838 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Erika Lynn Crable · 2022 to 2026
$914k
Refining and Pilot Testing a Decision Support Intervention to Facilitate Adoption of Evidence-Based Programs to Improve Parent and Child Mental HealthK01MH128761 · NIMH · OSLC DEVELOPMENTS · PI Gracelyn Cruden · 2022 to 2026
$843k
Policy Implementation Research on Earmarked Taxes for Mental Health ServicesR21MH125261 · NIMH · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI PURTLE, JONATHAN · 2021 to 2022
$404k
NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA056838NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA056838-01NIDA NIH HHS R25 DA037190NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH128761NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH113662NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH131649NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH125261NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH080916
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEngaging policy actors in research design and execution is critical to increasing the practical relevance and real-world impact of policy-focused dissemination and implementation science. Identifying and selecting which policy actors to engage, particularly actors involved in "Big P" public policies such as laws, is distinct from traditional engaged research methods. This current study aimed to develop a transparent, structured method for iteratively identifying policy actors involved in key policy decisions-such as adopting evidence-based interventions at systems-scale-and to guide implementation study sampling and engagement approaches. A flexible policy actor taxonomy was developed to supplement existing methods and help identify policy developers, disseminators, implementers, enforcers, and influencers.

methodsA five-step methodology for identifying policy actors to potentially engage in policy dissemination and implementation research was developed. Leveraging a recent federal policy as a case study-The Family First Prevention Services Act (FFPSA)-publicly available documentation (e.g., websites, reports) were searched, retrieved, and coded using content analysis to characterize the organizations and individual policy actors in the "room" during policy decisions.

resultsThe five steps are as follows: (1) clarify the policy implementation phase(s) of interest, (2) identify relevant proverbial or actual policymaking "rooms," (3) identify and characterize organizations in the room, (4) identify and characterize policy actors in the "room," and (5) quantify (e.g., count actors across groups), summarize, and compare "rooms" to develop or select engagement approaches aligned with the "room" and actors. The use and outcomes of each step are exemplified through the FFPSA case study.

conclusionsThe pragmatic and transparent policy actor identification steps presented here can guide researchers' methods for continuous sampling and successful policy actor engagement. Future work should explore the utility of the proposed methods for guiding selection and tailoring of engagement and implementation strategies (e.g., research-policy actor partnerships) to improve both "Big P" and "little p" (administrative guidelines, procedures) policymaking and implementation in global contexts.

Indexed as

PolicyPolicy actorsPolicy implementationPolicy implementation strategiesPolicymakers

Identifiers

PMID37723580
PMCPMC10506261
OpenAlexW4386833399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.